Hi Eleni,
First of all, I wanted to say that you have such an interesting set of topics! I wanted to read all of them. Regarding this theme of framing, I specifically compared your two articles on “Doctor Know It All With Multiple LLMs” and “How LLMs Can Supercharge Creativity”.
I really liked that you explored performances from multiple llm models and considered all types of possible biases in your evaluation, which made your blogs pretty neutral and informative to me as someone who wants to learn about the actual capacities of LLMs. In the Doctor Know It All article you described how four types of LLMs respond to each other in the game and did not show any preference, while in the second article you hinted at a positive view that LLM can be helpful for creative works. I did find myself thinking more positively about LLM’s responses while reading the second article following the argument, but I think it makes sense for you as the author to express the opinion. I liked how you were conscious about potential biases such as when you said “I may be biased but not all of these items are very good either.” In the future, you may consider thinking from the other side, for example testing whether LLM can also hinder creativity, to bring a more comprehensive view to the readers and also back up your argument. Overall, I enjoyed reading your post and like how you phrased LLM performance in an evaluative lens!
Best,
Haowei
Hi Eleni,
First of all, I wanted to say that you have such an interesting set of topics! I wanted to read all of them. Regarding this theme of framing, I specifically compared your two articles on “Doctor Know It All With Multiple LLMs” and “How LLMs Can Supercharge Creativity”.
I really liked that you explored performances from multiple llm models and considered all types of possible biases in your evaluation, which made your blogs pretty neutral and informative to me as someone who wants to learn about the actual capacities of LLMs. In the Doctor Know It All article you described how four types of LLMs respond to each other in the game and did not show any preference, while in the second article you hinted at a positive view that LLM can be helpful for creative works. I did find myself thinking more positively about LLM’s responses while reading the second article following the argument, but I think it makes sense for you as the author to express the opinion. I liked how you were conscious about potential biases such as when you said “I may be biased but not all of these items are very good either.” In the future, you may consider thinking from the other side, for example testing whether LLM can also hinder creativity, to bring a more comprehensive view to the readers and also back up your argument. Overall, I enjoyed reading your post and like how you phrased LLM performance in an evaluative lens!
Best,
Haowei