Skip to content

Include syntactic sugar type methods. #25

@commadelimited

Description

@commadelimited

Thanks for your time on this library. It's very well written. I'm using it locally to format plays for blog posts that I write weekly

Here:
http://www.meeplemountain.com/articles/game-every-day-journal-june-16th-2016/
and here:
http://www.meeplemountain.com/articles/2016/01/game-every-day/

I also wrote a quick script to compare the collections of two users:
https://gist.github.com/commadelimited/c2b76b16252017aa1a519fb82c8c2d5b

I'm wondering if you've ever considered including methods like this in a syntactic sugar type module. One which doesn't tie directly to endpoints in the BGG API, but instead includes additional things that users might want.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions