feat: grind? attribute

Author: leodemoura

src/Init/Grind/Tactics.lean

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ syntax grindIntro  := &"intro "
 syntax grindExt    := &"ext "
 syntax grindMod := grindEqBoth <|> grindEqRhs <|> grindEq <|> grindEqBwd <|> grindBwd <|> grindFwd <|> grindRL <|> grindLR <|> grindUsr <|> grindCasesEager <|> grindCases <|> grindIntro <|> grindExt
 syntax (name := grind) "grind" (grindMod)? : attr
+syntax (name := grind?) "grind?" (grindMod)? : attr
 end Attr
 end Lean.Parser
 

src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Grind/Attr.lean

@@ -49,11 +49,20 @@ def getAttrKindFromOpt (stx : Syntax) : CoreM AttrKind := do
 def throwInvalidUsrModifier : CoreM α :=
   throwError "the modifier `usr` is only relevant in parameters for `grind only`"
 
-builtin_initialize
+/--
+Auxiliary function for registering `grind` and `grind?` attributes.
+The `grind?` is an alias for `grind` which displays patterns using `logInfo`.
+It is just a convenience for users.
+-/
+private def registerGrindAttr (showInfo : Bool) : IO Unit :=
   registerBuiltinAttribute {
-    name := `grind
+    name := if showInfo then `grind? else `grind
     descr :=
-      "The `[grind]` attribute is used to annotate declarations.\
+      let header := if showInfo then
+        "The `[grind?]` attribute is identical to the `[grind]` attribute, but displays inferred pattern information."
+      else
+        "The `[grind]` attribute is used to annotate declarations."
+      header ++ "\
       \
       When applied to an equational theorem, `[grind =]`, `[grind =_]`, or `[grind _=_]`\
       will mark the theorem for use in heuristic instantiations by the `grind` tactic,
@@ -73,12 +82,12 @@ builtin_initialize
     add := fun declName stx attrKind => MetaM.run' do
       match (← getAttrKindFromOpt stx) with
       | .ematch .user => throwInvalidUsrModifier
-      | .ematch k => addEMatchAttr declName attrKind k
+      | .ematch k => addEMatchAttr declName attrKind k (showInfo := showInfo)
       | .cases eager => addCasesAttr declName eager attrKind
       | .intro =>
         if let some info ← isCasesAttrPredicateCandidate? declName false then
           for ctor in info.ctors do
-            addEMatchAttr ctor attrKind .default
+            addEMatchAttr ctor attrKind .default (showInfo := showInfo)
         else
           throwError "invalid `[grind intro]`, `{declName}` is not an inductive predicate"
       | .ext => addExtAttr declName attrKind
@@ -89,10 +98,12 @@ builtin_initialize
             -- If it is an inductive predicate,
             -- we also add the constructors (intro rules) as E-matching rules
             for ctor in info.ctors do
-              addEMatchAttr ctor attrKind .default
+              addEMatchAttr ctor attrKind .default (showInfo := showInfo)
         else
-          addEMatchAttr declName attrKind .default
+          addEMatchAttr declName attrKind .default (showInfo := showInfo)
     erase := fun declName => MetaM.run' do
+      if showInfo then
+        throwError "`[grind?]` is a helper attribute for displaying inferred patterns, if you want to remove the attribute, consider using `[grind]` instead"
       if (← isCasesAttrCandidate declName false) then
         eraseCasesAttr declName
       else if (← isExtTheorem declName) then
@@ -101,4 +112,8 @@ builtin_initialize
         eraseEMatchAttr declName
   }
 
+builtin_initialize
+  registerGrindAttr true
+  registerGrindAttr false
+
 end Lean.Meta.Grind

src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Grind/EMatchTheorem.lean

@@ -589,18 +589,24 @@ private def ppParamsAt (proof : Expr) (numParams : Nat) (paramPos : List Nat) :
         msg := msg ++ m!"{x} : {← inferType x}"
     addMessageContextFull msg
 
+private def logPatternWhen (showInfo : Bool) (origin : Origin) (patterns : List Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
+  if showInfo then
+    logInfo m!"{← origin.pp}: {patterns.map ppPattern}"
+
 /--
 Creates an E-matching theorem for a theorem with proof `proof`, `numParams` parameters, and the given set of patterns.
 Pattern variables are represented using de Bruijn indices.
 -/
-def mkEMatchTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (numParams : Nat) (proof : Expr) (patterns : List Expr) (kind : EMatchTheoremKind) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
+def mkEMatchTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (numParams : Nat) (proof : Expr)
+    (patterns : List Expr) (kind : EMatchTheoremKind) (showInfo := false) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
   let (patterns, symbols, bvarFound) ← NormalizePattern.main patterns
   if symbols.isEmpty then
     throwError "invalid pattern for `{← origin.pp}`{indentD (patterns.map ppPattern)}\nthe pattern does not contain constant symbols for indexing"
-  trace[grind.ematch.pattern] "{MessageData.ofConst proof}: {patterns.map ppPattern}"
+  trace[grind.ematch.pattern] "{← origin.pp}: {patterns.map ppPattern}"
   if let .missing pos ← checkCoverage proof numParams bvarFound then
      let pats : MessageData := m!"{patterns.map ppPattern}"
      throwError "invalid pattern(s) for `{← origin.pp}`{indentD pats}\nthe following theorem parameters cannot be instantiated:{indentD (← ppParamsAt proof numParams pos)}"
+  logPatternWhen showInfo origin patterns
   return {
     proof, patterns, numParams, symbols
     levelParams, origin, kind
@@ -627,7 +633,7 @@ Given a theorem with proof `proof` and type of the form `∀ (a_1 ... a_n), lhs
 creates an E-matching pattern for it using `addEMatchTheorem n [lhs]`
 If `normalizePattern` is true, it applies the `grind` simplification theorems and simprocs to the pattern.
 -/
-def mkEMatchEqTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof : Expr) (normalizePattern : Bool) (useLhs : Bool) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
+def mkEMatchEqTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof : Expr) (normalizePattern : Bool) (useLhs : Bool) (showInfo := false) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
   let (numParams, patterns) ← forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType proof) fun xs type => do
     let (lhs, rhs) ← match_expr type with
       | Eq _ lhs rhs => pure (lhs, rhs)
@@ -640,15 +646,15 @@ def mkEMatchEqTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof :
     trace[grind.debug.ematch.pattern] "mkEMatchEqTheoremCore: after preprocessing: {pat}, {← normalize pat normConfig}"
     let pats := splitWhileForbidden (pat.abstract xs)
     return (xs.size, pats)
-  mkEMatchTheoremCore origin levelParams numParams proof patterns (if useLhs then .eqLhs else .eqRhs)
+  mkEMatchTheoremCore origin levelParams numParams proof patterns (if useLhs then .eqLhs else .eqRhs) (showInfo := showInfo)
 
-def mkEMatchEqBwdTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof : Expr) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
+def mkEMatchEqBwdTheoremCore (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof : Expr) (showInfo := false) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
   let (numParams, patterns) ← forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType proof) fun xs type => do
     let_expr f@Eq α lhs rhs := type
       | throwError "invalid E-matching `←=` theorem, conclusion must be an equality{indentExpr type}"
     let pat ← preprocessPattern (mkEqBwdPattern f.constLevels! α lhs rhs)
     return (xs.size, [pat.abstract xs])
-  mkEMatchTheoremCore origin levelParams numParams proof patterns .eqBwd
+  mkEMatchTheoremCore origin levelParams numParams proof patterns .eqBwd (showInfo := showInfo)
 
 /--
 Given theorem with name `declName` and type of the form `∀ (a_1 ... a_n), lhs = rhs`,
@@ -657,8 +663,8 @@ creates an E-matching pattern for it using `addEMatchTheorem n [lhs]`
 If `normalizePattern` is true, it applies the `grind` simplification theorems and simprocs to the
 pattern.
 -/
-def mkEMatchEqTheorem (declName : Name) (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs : Bool := true) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
-  mkEMatchEqTheoremCore (.decl declName) #[] (← getProofFor declName) normalizePattern useLhs
+def mkEMatchEqTheorem (declName : Name) (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs : Bool := true) (showInfo := false) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
+  mkEMatchEqTheoremCore (.decl declName) #[] (← getProofFor declName) normalizePattern useLhs (showInfo := showInfo)
 
 /--
 Adds an E-matching theorem to the environment.
@@ -844,13 +850,13 @@ since the theorem is already in the `grind` state and there is nothing to be ins
 -/
 def mkEMatchTheoremWithKind?
       (origin : Origin) (levelParams : Array Name) (proof : Expr) (kind : EMatchTheoremKind)
-      (groundPatterns := true) : MetaM (Option EMatchTheorem) := do
+      (groundPatterns := true) (showInfo := false) : MetaM (Option EMatchTheorem) := do
   if kind == .eqLhs then
-    return (← mkEMatchEqTheoremCore origin levelParams proof (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := true))
+    return (← mkEMatchEqTheoremCore origin levelParams proof (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := true) (showInfo := showInfo))
   else if kind == .eqRhs then
-    return (← mkEMatchEqTheoremCore origin levelParams proof (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := false))
+    return (← mkEMatchEqTheoremCore origin levelParams proof (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := false) (showInfo := showInfo))
   else if kind == .eqBwd then
-    return (← mkEMatchEqBwdTheoremCore origin levelParams proof)
+    return (← mkEMatchEqBwdTheoremCore origin levelParams proof (showInfo := showInfo))
   let type ← inferType proof
   /-
   Remark: we should not use `forallTelescopeReducing` (with default reducibility) here
@@ -894,25 +900,26 @@ where
       return none
     let numParams := xs.size
     trace[grind.ematch.pattern] "{← origin.pp}: {patterns.map ppPattern}"
+    logPatternWhen showInfo origin patterns
     return some {
       proof, patterns, numParams, symbols
       levelParams, origin, kind
     }
 
-def mkEMatchTheoremForDecl (declName : Name) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
-  let some thm ← mkEMatchTheoremWithKind? (.decl declName) #[] (← getProofFor declName) thmKind
+def mkEMatchTheoremForDecl (declName : Name) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) (showInfo := false) : MetaM EMatchTheorem := do
+  let some thm ← mkEMatchTheoremWithKind? (.decl declName) #[] (← getProofFor declName) thmKind (showInfo := showInfo)
     | throwError "`@{thmKind.toAttribute} theorem {declName}` {thmKind.explainFailure}, consider using different options or the `grind_pattern` command"
   return thm
 
-def mkEMatchEqTheoremsForDef? (declName : Name) : MetaM (Option (Array EMatchTheorem)) := do
+def mkEMatchEqTheoremsForDef? (declName : Name) (showInfo := false) : MetaM (Option (Array EMatchTheorem)) := do
   let some eqns ← getEqnsFor? declName | return none
   eqns.mapM fun eqn => do
-    mkEMatchEqTheorem eqn (normalizePattern := true)
+    mkEMatchEqTheorem eqn (normalizePattern := true) (showInfo := showInfo)
 
-private def addGrindEqAttr (declName : Name) (attrKind : AttributeKind) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) (useLhs := true) : MetaM Unit := do
+private def addGrindEqAttr (declName : Name) (attrKind : AttributeKind) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) (useLhs := true) (showInfo := false) : MetaM Unit := do
   if wasOriginallyTheorem (← getEnv) declName then
-    ematchTheoremsExt.add (← mkEMatchEqTheorem declName (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := useLhs)) attrKind
-  else if let some thms ← mkEMatchEqTheoremsForDef? declName then
+    ematchTheoremsExt.add (← mkEMatchEqTheorem declName (normalizePattern := true) (useLhs := useLhs) (showInfo := showInfo)) attrKind
+  else if let some thms ← mkEMatchEqTheoremsForDef? declName (showInfo := showInfo) then
     unless useLhs do
       throwError "`{declName}` is a definition, you must only use the left-hand side for extracting patterns"
     thms.forM (ematchTheoremsExt.add · attrKind)
@@ -935,20 +942,20 @@ def EMatchTheorems.eraseDecl (s : EMatchTheorems) (declName : Name) : MetaM EMat
       throwErr
     return s.erase <| .decl declName
 
-def addEMatchAttr (declName : Name) (attrKind : AttributeKind) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) : MetaM Unit := do
+def addEMatchAttr (declName : Name) (attrKind : AttributeKind) (thmKind : EMatchTheoremKind) (showInfo := false) : MetaM Unit := do
   if thmKind == .eqLhs then
-    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := true)
+    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := true) (showInfo := showInfo)
   else if thmKind == .eqRhs then
-    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := false)
+    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := false) (showInfo := showInfo)
   else if thmKind == .eqBoth then
-    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := true)
-    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := false)
+    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := true) (showInfo := showInfo)
+    addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (useLhs := false) (showInfo := showInfo)
   else
     let info ← getConstInfo declName
     if !wasOriginallyTheorem (← getEnv) declName && !info.isCtor && !info.isAxiom then
-      addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind
+      addGrindEqAttr declName attrKind thmKind (showInfo := showInfo)
     else
-      let thm ← mkEMatchTheoremForDecl declName thmKind
+      let thm ← mkEMatchTheoremForDecl declName thmKind (showInfo := showInfo)
       ematchTheoremsExt.add thm attrKind
 
 def eraseEMatchAttr (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do

tests/lean/run/grind_attrs.lean

@@ -44,3 +44,18 @@ set_option trace.grind.ematch.pattern true in
 set_option trace.grind.ematch.pattern true in
 @[grind =>] theorem State.update_le_update (h : State.le σ' σ) : State.le (σ'.update x v) (σ.update x v) :=
   sorry
+
+
+namespace Foo
+
+/-- info: Rtrans: [R #4 #3, R #3 #2] -/
+#guard_msgs (info) in
+@[grind? ->]
+axiom Rtrans {x y z : Nat} : R x y → R y z → R x z
+
+/-- info: Rtrans': [R #4 #3, R #3 #2] -/
+#guard_msgs (info) in
+@[grind? →]
+axiom Rtrans' {x y z : Nat} : R x y → R y z → R x z
+
+end Foo

tests/lean/run/grind_countP.lean

@@ -13,3 +13,11 @@ grind_pattern List.countP_le_countP => l.countP P, l.countP Q
 theorem List.countP_lt_countP (hpq : ∀ x ∈ l, P x → Q x) (y:α) (hx: y ∈ l) (hxP : P y = false) (hxQ : Q y) :
     l.countP P < l.countP Q := by
   induction l <;> grind
+
+/--
+info: List.countP_nil: [@List.countP #1 #0 (@List.nil _)]
+---
+info: List.countP_cons: [@List.countP #3 #2 (@List.cons _ #1 #0)]
+-/
+#guard_msgs (info) in
+attribute [grind?] List.countP_nil List.countP_cons

tests/lean/run/grind_eq.lean

@@ -76,3 +76,12 @@ trace: [grind.assert] x1 = appV a_2 b
 #guard_msgs (trace) in
 example : x1 = appV a b → x2 = appV x1 c → x3 = appV b c → x4 = appV a x3 → HEq x2 x4 := by
   grind
+
+
+/--
+info: appV_assoc': [@appV #6 #5 (@HAdd.hAdd `[Nat] `[Nat] `[Nat] `[instHAdd] #4 #3) #2 (@appV _ #4 #3 #1 #0)]
+-/
+#guard_msgs (info) in
+@[grind? =]
+theorem appV_assoc' (a : Vector α n) (b : Vector α m) (c : Vector α n') :
+        HEq (appV a (appV b c)) (appV (appV a b) c) := sorry