We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This might be related to #3405:
.mix (@n) { value: @n; } @var: .mix(var); #lookup { @var: .mix(lookup); @bar: bar; } .example { @var(); value2: #lookup[@bar]; // This is what I'm trying to do, since the above works: #lookup[@var](); }
Expected:
.example { value: lookup; value2: bar; }
Actual: unexpected token.
In this case I can't find a workaround using detached rulesets, but since @var() works I expect the nested syntax #lookup[@var]() to work as well.
@var()
#lookup[@var]()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
AFAIK this is simply an unsupported feature i.e. you can't call a mixin from a lookup. You need to alias it to a variable, as you mentioned.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Added less#3406 example
8821fb4
472b7bd
Fixes #3405 (#3426)
3f8a6ae
* Fixes to Gruntfile * Fixes #3405 * Added #3406 example
No branches or pull requests
This might be related to #3405:
Expected:
Actual: unexpected token.
In this case I can't find a workaround using detached rulesets, but since
@var()
works I expect the nested syntax#lookup[@var]()
to work as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: