You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Raster interrupt position in V400 modes are bad. My idea back to then was wrong:
raster IRQs (and reading back current raster) is in "physical rasters",
so different in V200/V400 modes.
However according to my tests on MEGA65, it seems, raster bars do not
change position at all, while toggling between V400/V200 mode. So
clearly they are measured in "VIC-II rasters" always, also called
"logical raster". The same seems to apply to reading current raster as
well, can be easily tested with the BASIC65 `VSYNC` command.
Introduced in branch "next".
// NOTE: previous versions used interrupt_checker() here. For reasons, I had to remove this, so calling check_raster_interrupt() does not do interrupt_checker() as its own anymore!!
0 commit comments