-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathref.bib
More file actions
executable file
·2645 lines (2461 loc) · 182 KB
/
ref.bib
File metadata and controls
executable file
·2645 lines (2461 loc) · 182 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@inproceedings{abadiDeepLearningDifferential2016,
title = {Deep {{Learning}} with {{Differential Privacy}}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2016 {{ACM SIGSAC Conference}} on {{Computer}} and {{Communications Security}}},
year = {2016},
month = oct,
series = {{{CCS}} '16},
pages = {308--318},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
doi = {10.1145/2976749.2978318},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2976749.2978318},
urldate = {2025-02-17},
abstract = {Machine learning techniques based on neural networks are achieving remarkable results in a wide variety of domains. Often, the training of models requires large, representative datasets, which may be crowdsourced and contain sensitive information. The models should not expose private information in these datasets. Addressing this goal, we develop new algorithmic techniques for learning and a refined analysis of privacy costs within the framework of differential privacy. Our implementation and experiments demonstrate that we can train deep neural networks with non-convex objectives, under a modest privacy budget, and at a manageable cost in software complexity, training efficiency, and model quality.},
isbn = {978-1-4503-4139-4},
author = {Abadi, Martin and Chu, Andy and Goodfellow, Ian and McMahan, H. Brendan and Mironov, Ilya and Talwar, Kunal and Zhang, Li}
}
@misc{abdelgawadInductionCoinductionFixed2019,
title = {Induction, {{Coinduction}}, and {{Fixed Points}}: {{Intuitions}} and {{Tutorial}}},
shorttitle = {Induction, {{Coinduction}}, and {{Fixed Points}}},
year = {2019},
month = feb,
number = {arXiv:1903.05127},
eprint = {1903.05127},
publisher = {arXiv},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1903.05127},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05127},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Recently we presented a concise survey of the formulation of the induction and coinduction principles, and some concepts related to them, in five different fields mathematical fields, hence shedding some light on the precise relation between these fields. In this article we present few tutorial examples---from set theory, number theory and real analysis---that illustrate these concepts, and the intuitions behind them, more concretely.},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
keywords = {Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science},
author = {AbdelGawad, Moez A.}
}
@incollection{aignerTouchingSimplices2018,
title = {Touching Simplices},
booktitle = {Proofs from {{THE BOOK}}},
year = {2018},
pages = {107--110},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-57265-8_16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57265-8_16},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
abstract = {This is an old and very natural question. We shall call f(d) the answer to this problem, and record f(1) = 2, which is trivial. For d = 2 the configuration of four triangles in the margin shows f(2) ≥ 4. There is no similar configuration with five triangles, because from this the dual graph construction, which for our example with four triangles yields a planar drawing of K4, would give a planar embedding of K5, which is impossible (see page 91).},
isbn = {978-3-662-57265-8},
author = {Aigner, Martin and Ziegler, Günter M.},
editor = {Aigner, Martin and Ziegler, Günter M.}
}
@article{anscombeDefinitionSubjectiveProbability1963,
title = {A Definition of Subjective Probability},
year = {1963},
journal = {Annals of mathematical statistics},
volume = {34},
number = {1},
pages = {199--205},
url = {https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~dbackus/Exotic/1Ambiguity/AnscombeAumann%20AMS%2063.pdf},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Anscombe, Francis J. and Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@article{aumannAgreeingDisagree1976,
title = {Agreeing to {{Disagree}}},
year = {1976},
month = nov,
journal = {The Annals of Statistics},
volume = {4},
number = {6},
pages = {1236--1239},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0090-5364, 2168-8966},
doi = {10.1214/aos/1176343654},
url = {https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volume-4/issue-6/Agreeing-to-Disagree/10.1214/aos/1176343654.full},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Two people, 1 and 2, are said to have common knowledge of an event \$E\$ if both know it, 1 knows that 2 knows it, 2 knows that 1 knows is, 1 knows that 2 knows that 1 knows it, and so on. THEOREM. If two people have the same priors, and their posteriors for an event \$A\$ are common knowledge, then these posteriors are equal.},
keywords = {62A15,62C05,90A05,90D35,concensus,Game theory,Harsanyi doctrine,Information,Posterior,revising probabilities,statistics,subjective probability},
author = {Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@article{aumannCorrelatedEquilibriumExpression1987,
title = {Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of {{Bayesian}} Rationality},
year = {1987},
journal = {Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society},
eprint = {1911154},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {1--18},
publisher = {JSTOR},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/1911154},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@article{aumannEpistemicConditionsNash1995,
title = {Epistemic {{Conditions}} for {{Nash Equilibrium}}},
year = {1995},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {63},
number = {5},
eprint = {2171725},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {1161--1180},
publisher = {[Wiley, Econometric Society]},
issn = {0012-9682},
doi = {10.2307/2171725},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2171725},
urldate = {2024-05-15},
abstract = {Sufficient conditions for Nash equilibrium in an n-person game are given in terms of what the players know and believe--about the game, and about each other's rationality, actions, knowledge, and beliefs. Mixed strategies are treated not as conscious randomizations, but as conjectures, on the part of other players, as to what a player will do. Common knowledge plays a smaller role in characterizing Nash equilibrium than had been supposed. When n = 2, mutual knowledge of the payoff functions, of rationality, and of the conjectures implies that the conjectures form a Nash equilibrium. When n ≥ 3 and there is a common prior, mutual knowledge of the payoff functions and of rationality, and common knowledge of the conjectures, imply that the conjectures form a Nash equilibrium. Examples show the results to be tight.},
author = {Aumann, Robert and Brandenburger, Adam}
}
@book{aumannLecturesGameTheory1989,
title = {Lectures on Game Theory},
year = {1989},
publisher = {Westview Press},
address = {Boulder},
isbn = {978-0-8133-7578-6},
keywords = {Economics Mathematical.,Game theory.},
annotation = {Open Library ID: OL2035021M},
author = {Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@article{aumannRationalityBoundedRationality1997,
title = {Rationality and Bounded Rationality},
year = {1997},
journal = {Games and Economic behavior},
volume = {21},
number = {1-2},
pages = {2--14},
publisher = {Elsevier},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825697905856},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@article{aumannWhatGameTheory1985,
title = {What Is Game Theory Trying to Accomplish?},
year = {1985},
month = jan,
journal = {Frontiers of economics},
url = {https://www.academia.edu/78583058/What_is_game_theory_trying_to_accomplish},
urldate = {2024-04-16},
abstract = {What is game theory trying to accomplish?},
author = {Aumann, Robert J.}
}
@misc{avigadTheoremProvingLean,
title = {Theorem {{Proving}} in {{Lean}} 4},
url = {https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean4/title_page.html},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
note = {(accessed 2025-02-15)},
howpublished = {\url{https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean4/title_page.html}},
author = {Avigad, Jeremy and {de Moura}, Leonardo and Kong, Soonho and Ullrich, Sebastian}
}
@article{bacharachExtensionsClaimAumann1985,
title = {Some Extensions of a Claim of {{Aumann}} in an Axiomatic Model of Knowledge},
year = {1985},
month = oct,
journal = {Journal of Economic Theory},
volume = {37},
number = {1},
pages = {167--190},
issn = {0022-0531},
doi = {10.1016/0022-0531(85)90035-3},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022053185900353},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {The paper begins by presenting an axiomatic model of simple and iterated knowledge. A formal definition of the intuitive notion of common knowledge is given and shown equivalent to previous characterizations. It is shown that agents have information partitions. The second part generalizes Aumann's (Ann. Statist. 4 (1976), 1236–1239) well-known propositions about common knowledge between two rational agents of each other's probability assignments. It is shown that: common knowledge of decisions—if these are rational—implies a common decision for like-minded agents; and that a “dialogue” in decisions leads to a common decision. A “no-trade” theorem is given which includes trade under complete uncertainty.},
author = {Bacharach, Michael}
}
@article{banachOperationsDansEnsembles1922,
title = {{Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales}},
year = {1922},
journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
volume = {3},
pages = {133--181},
publisher = {Instytut Matematyczny Polskiej Akademii Nauk},
issn = {0016-2736, 1730-6329},
doi = {10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181},
url = {https://www.impan.pl/pl/wydawnictwa/czasopisma-i-serie-wydawnicze/fundamenta-mathematicae/all/3/0/92453/sur-les-operations-dans-les-ensembles-abstraits-et-leur-application-aux-equations-integrales},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Le but de cette note est d'établir quelques théorèmes valables pour différents champs fonctionnels.},
author = {Banach, Stefan}
}
@article{bar-hillelBaserateFallacyProbability1980,
title = {The Base-Rate Fallacy in Probability Judgments},
year = {1980},
month = may,
journal = {Acta Psychologica},
volume = {44},
number = {3},
pages = {211--233},
issn = {0001-6918},
doi = {10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001691880900463},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {The base-rate fallacy is people's tendency to ignore base rates in favor of, e.g., individuating information (when such is available), rather than integrate the two. This tendency has important implications for understanding judgment phenomena in many clinical, legal, and social-psychological settings. An explanation of this phenomenon is offered, according to which people order information by its perceived degree of relevance, and let high-relevance information dominate low-relevance information. Information is deemed more relevant when it relates more specifically to a judged target case. Specificity is achieved either by providing information on a smaller set than the overall population, of which the target case is a member, or when information can be coded, via causality, as information about the specific members of a given population. The base-rate fallacy is thus the result of pitting what seem to be merely coincidental, therefore low-relevance, base rates against more specific, or causal, information. A series of probabilistic inference problems is presented in which relevance was manipulated with the means described above, and the empirical results confirm the above account. In particular, base rates will be combined with other information when the two kinds of information are perceived as being equally relevant to the judged case.},
author = {{Bar-Hillel}, Maya}
}
@article{baumStatisticalInferenceProbabilistic1966,
title = {Statistical {{Inference}} for {{Probabilistic Functions}} of {{Finite State Markov Chains}}},
year = {1966},
month = dec,
journal = {The Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
volume = {37},
number = {6},
pages = {1554--1563},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0003-4851, 2168-8990},
doi = {10.1214/aoms/1177699147},
url = {https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-mathematical-statistics/volume-37/issue-6/Statistical-Inference-for-Probabilistic-Functions-of-Finite-State-Markov-Chains/10.1214/aoms/1177699147.full},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {The Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
author = {Baum, Leonard E. and Petrie, Ted}
}
@book{bauschkeConvexAnalysisMonotone2017,
title = {Convex {{Analysis}} and {{Monotone Operator Theory}} in {{Hilbert Spaces}}},
year = {2017},
series = {{{CMS Books}} in {{Mathematics}}},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
address = {Cham},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
copyright = {https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining},
isbn = {978-3-319-48310-8 978-3-319-48311-5},
keywords = {Convex analysis,convex optimization,fixed point algorithm,monotone operator,nonexpansive operator,operator splitting algorithm,proximal algorithm},
author = {Bauschke, Heinz H. and Combettes, Patrick L.}
}
@article{bellmanTheoryDynamicProgramming1952,
title = {On the {{Theory}} of {{Dynamic Programming}}},
year = {1952},
month = aug,
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
volume = {38},
number = {8},
pages = {716--719},
publisher = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.38.8.716},
url = {https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.38.8.716},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
author = {Bellman, Richard}
}
@book{benthemModalLogicOpen2010,
title = {Modal Logic for Open Minds},
year = {2010},
publisher = {{Stanford, Calif. : Center for the Study of Language and Information}},
url = {http://archive.org/details/modallogicforope0000bent},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {xi, 381 pages : 24 cm; In this work, the author provides an introduction to the field of modal logic, outlining its major ideas and emploring the numerous ways in which various academic fields have adopted it; Includes bibliographical references and index},
isbn = {978-1-57586-599-7 978-1-57586-698-7 978-1-57586-598-0},
keywords = {Modality (Logic)},
author = {van Benthem, Johan},
collaborator = {{Internet Archive}}
}
@article{bickelSexBiasGraduate1975,
title = {Sex {{Bias}} in {{Graduate Admissions}}: {{Data}} from {{Berkeley}}},
shorttitle = {Sex {{Bias}} in {{Graduate Admissions}}},
year = {1975},
month = feb,
journal = {Science},
volume = {187},
number = {4175},
pages = {398--404},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
doi = {10.1126/science.187.4175.398},
url = {https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.187.4175.398},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {Examination of aggregate data on graduate admissions to the University of California, Berkeley, for fall 1973 shows a clear but misleading pattern of bias against female applicants. Examination of the disaggregated data reveals few decision-making units that show statistically significant departures from expected frequencies of female admissions, and about as many units appear to favor women as to favor men. If the data are properly pooled, taking into account the autonomy of departmental decision making, thus correcting for the tendency of women to apply to graduate departments that are more difficult for applicants of either sex to enter, there is a small but statistically significant bias in favor of women. The graduate departments that are easier to enter tend to be those that require more mathematics in the undergraduate preparatory curriculum. The bias in the aggregated data stems not from any pattern of discrimination on the part of admissions committees, which seem quite fair on the whole, but apparently from prior screening at earlier levels of the educational system. Women are shunted by their socialization and education toward fields of graduate study that are generally more crowded, less productive of completed degrees, and less well funded, and that frequently offer poorer professional employment prospects.},
author = {Bickel, P. J. and Hammel, E. A. and O'Connell, J. W.}
}
@article{bishopMaximumLikelihoodAlignment1986,
title = {Maximum Likelihood Alignment of {{DNA}} Sequences},
year = {1986},
month = jul,
journal = {Journal of Molecular Biology},
volume = {190},
number = {2},
pages = {159--165},
issn = {0022-2836},
doi = {10.1016/0022-2836(86)90289-5},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022283686902895},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {The optimal alignment problem for pairs of molecular sequences under a probabilistic model of evolutionary change is equivalent to the problem of estimating the maximum likelihood time required to transform one sequence to the other. When this time has been estimated, various alignments of high posterior probability may be written down. A simple model with two parameters is presented and a method is described by which the likelihood may be computed. Maximum likelihood estimates for some pairs of tRNA genes illustrate the method and allow us to obtain the best alignments under the model.},
author = {Bishop, M. J. and Thompson, E. A.}
}
@book{blackburnModalLogic2001,
title = {Modal {{Logic}}},
year = {2001},
series = {Cambridge {{Tracts}} in {{Theoretical Computer Science}}},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781107050884},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/modal-logic/F7CDB0A265026BF05EAD1091A47FCF5B},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {This is an advanced 2001 textbook on modal logic, a field which caught the attention of computer scientists in the late 1970s. Researchers in areas ranging from economics to computational linguistics have since realised its worth. The book is for novices and for more experienced readers, with two distinct tracks clearly signposted at the start of each chapter. The development is mathematical; prior acquaintance with first-order logic and its semantics is assumed, and familiarity with the basic mathematical notions of set theory is required. The authors focus on the use of modal languages as tools to analyze the properties of relational structures, including their algorithmic and algebraic aspects, and applications to issues in logic and computer science such as completeness, computability and complexity are considered. Three appendices supply basic background information and numerous exercises are provided. Ideal for anyone wanting to learn modern modal logic.},
isbn = {978-0-521-52714-9},
author = {Blackburn, Patrick and de Rijke, Maarten and Venema, Yde}
}
@book{boydConvexOptimization2004,
title = {Convex {{Optimization}}},
year = {2004},
edition = {第 1st 版},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge New York Melbourne New Delhi Singapore},
abstract = {Convex optimization problems arise frequently in many different fields. A comprehensive introduction to the subject, this book shows in detail how such problems can be solved numerically with great efficiency. The focus is on recognizing convex optimization problems and then finding the most appropriate technique for solving them. The text contains many worked examples and homework exercises and will appeal to students, researchers and practitioners in fields such as engineering, computer science, mathematics, statistics, finance, and economics.},
isbn = {978-0-521-83378-3},
author = {Boyd, Stephen and Vandenberghe, Lieven}
}
@article{breimanIndividualErgodicTheorem1957,
title = {The {{Individual Ergodic Theorem}} of {{Information Theory}}},
year = {1957},
journal = {The Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
volume = {28},
number = {3},
eprint = {2237247},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {809--811},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0003-4851},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2237247},
urldate = {2023-07-10},
author = {Breiman, Leo}
}
@article{brouwerUeberAbbildungMannigfaltigkeiten1911,
title = {{Über Abbildung von Mannigfaltigkeiten}},
year = {1911},
month = mar,
journal = {Mathematische Annalen},
volume = {71},
number = {1},
pages = {97--115},
issn = {1432-1807},
doi = {10.1007/BF01456931},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01456931},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Brouwer, L. E. J.}
}
@article{brownAdmissibleEstimatorsRecurrent1971,
title = {Admissible {{Estimators}}, {{Recurrent Diffusions}}, and {{Insoluble Boundary Value Problems}}},
year = {1971},
month = jun,
journal = {The Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
volume = {42},
number = {3},
pages = {855--903},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0003-4851, 2168-8990},
doi = {10.1214/aoms/1177693318},
url = {https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-mathematical-statistics/volume-42/issue-3/Admissible-Estimators-Recurrent-Diffusions-and-Insoluble-Boundary-Value-Problems/10.1214/aoms/1177693318.full},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
abstract = {The Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
author = {Brown, L. D.}
}
@article{brownGeometricalExplanationStein2012,
title = {A {{Geometrical Explanation}} of {{Stein Shrinkage}}},
year = {2012},
journal = {Statistical Science},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
eprint = {23208821},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {24--30},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0883-4237},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/23208821},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
abstract = {Shrinkage estimation has become a basic tool in the analysis of high-dimensional data. Historically and conceptually a key development toward this was the discovery of the inadmissibility of the usual estimator of a multivariate normal mean. This article develops a geometrical explanation for this inadmissibility. By exploiting the spherical symmetry of the problem it is possible to effectively conceptualize the multidimensional setting in a two-dimensional framework that can be easily plotted and geometrically analyzed. We begin with the heuristic explanation for inadmissibility that was given by Stein [In Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1954—1955, Vol. I (1956) 197—206, Univ. California Press]. Some geometric figures are included to make this reasoning more tangible. It is also explained why Stein's argument falls short of yielding a proof of inadmissibility, even when the dimension, p, is much larger than p = 3. We then extend the geometric idea to yield increasingly persuasive arguments for inadmissibility when p ≤ 3, albeit at the cost of increased geometric and computational detail.},
author = {Brown, Lawrence D. and Zhao, Linda H.}
}
@misc{ChatGPTOpenAI,
title = {{{ChatGPT}} | {{OpenAI}}},
url = {https://openai.com/chatgpt/overview/},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
note = {(accessed 2025-02-13)},
howpublished = {\url{https://openai.com/chatgpt/overview/}}
}
@article{chebyshevQuestionsSmallestQuantities1947,
title = {Questions on Smallest Quantities Connected with the Approximate Representation of Functions (1859)},
year = {1947},
journal = {Collected works},
volume = {2},
pages = {151--235},
author = {Chebyshev, P. L.}
}
@article{cisekCorticalMechanismsAction2007,
title = {Cortical Mechanisms of Action Selection: The Affordance Competition Hypothesis},
shorttitle = {Cortical Mechanisms of Action Selection},
year = {2007},
month = sep,
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences},
volume = {362},
number = {1485},
pages = {1585--1599},
issn = {0962-8436},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2007.2054},
abstract = {At every moment, the natural world presents animals with two fundamental pragmatic problems: selection between actions that are currently possible and specification of the parameters or metrics of those actions. It is commonly suggested that the brain addresses these by first constructing representations of the world on which to build knowledge and make a decision, and then by computing and executing an action plan. However, neurophysiological data argue against this serial viewpoint. In contrast, it is proposed here that the brain processes sensory information to specify, in parallel, several potential actions that are currently available. These potential actions compete against each other for further processing, while information is collected to bias this competition until a single response is selected. The hypothesis suggests that the dorsal visual system specifies actions which compete against each other within the fronto-parietal cortex, while a variety of biasing influences are provided by prefrontal regions and the basal ganglia. A computational model is described, which illustrates how this competition may take place in the cerebral cortex. Simulations of the model capture qualitative features of neurophysiological data and reproduce various behavioural phenomena.},
pmcid = {PMC2440773},
pmid = {17428779},
keywords = {Animals,Cerebral Cortex,Computer Simulation,Decision Making,Models Neurological,Visual Perception},
author = {Cisek, Paul}
}
@inproceedings{clarkeDesignSynthesisSynchronization1981,
title = {Design and {{Synthesis}} of {{Synchronization Skeletons Using Branching-Time Temporal Logic}}},
booktitle = {Logic of {{Programs}}, {{Workshop}}},
year = {1981},
month = may,
pages = {52--71},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
urldate = {2024-05-10},
isbn = {978-3-540-11212-9},
author = {Clarke, Edmund M. and Emerson, E. Allen}
}
@article{cortesSupportvectorNetworks1995,
title = {Support-Vector Networks},
year = {1995},
month = sep,
journal = {Machine Learning},
volume = {20},
number = {3},
pages = {273--297},
issn = {1573-0565},
doi = {10.1007/BF00994018},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
abstract = {Thesupport-vector network is a new learning machine for two-group classification problems. The machine conceptually implements the following idea: input vectors are non-linearly mapped to a very high-dimension feature space. In this feature space a linear decision surface is constructed. Special properties of the decision surface ensures high generalization ability of the learning machine. The idea behind the support-vector network was previously implemented for the restricted case where the training data can be separated without errors. We here extend this result to non-separable training data.},
keywords = {Artificial Intelligence,efficient learning algorithms,neural networks,pattern recognition,polynomial classifiers,radial basis function classifiers},
author = {Cortes, Corinna and Vapnik, Vladimir}
}
@book{coverElementsInformationTheory2012,
title = {Elements of {{Information Theory}}},
year = {2012},
publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
author = {Cover, Thomas M. and Thomas, Joy A.}
}
@article{coxProbabilityFrequencyReasonable1946,
title = {Probability, {{Frequency}} and {{Reasonable Expectation}}},
year = {1946},
month = jan,
journal = {American Journal of Physics},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1--13},
issn = {0002-9505},
doi = {10.1119/1.1990764},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1990764},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
author = {Cox, R. T.}
}
@article{craigSignificanceInsulaEvolution2011,
title = {Significance of the Insula for the Evolution of Human Awareness of Feelings from the Body},
year = {2011},
month = apr,
journal = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences},
volume = {1225},
pages = {72--82},
issn = {1749-6632},
doi = {10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05990.x},
abstract = {An ascending sensory pathway that underlies feelings from the body, such as cooling or toothache, terminates in the posterior insula. Considerable evidence suggests that this activity is rerepresented and integrated first in the mid-insula and then in the anterior insula. Activation in the anterior insula correlates directly with subjective feelings from the body and, strikingly, with all emotional feelings. These findings appear to signify a posterior-to-anterior sequence of increasingly homeostatically efficient representations that integrate all salient neural activity, culminating in network nodes in the right and left anterior insulae that may be organized asymmetrically in an opponent fashion. The anterior insula has appropriate characteristics to support the proposal that it engenders a cinemascopic model of human awareness and subjectivity. This review presents the author's views regarding the principles of organization of this system and discusses a possible sequence for its evolution, as well as particular issues of historical interest.},
pmid = {21534994},
keywords = {Afferent Pathways,Animals,Awareness,Biological Evolution,Cerebral Cortex,Emotions,Human Body,Humans,Neural Pathways,Sensation},
author = {Craig, A. D. Bud}
}
@inproceedings{cuffDifferentialPrivacyMutual2016,
title = {Differential {{Privacy}} as a {{Mutual Information Constraint}}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2016 {{ACM SIGSAC Conference}} on {{Computer}} and {{Communications Security}}},
year = {2016},
month = oct,
pages = {43--54},
publisher = {ACM},
address = {Vienna Austria},
doi = {10.1145/2976749.2978308},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2976749.2978308},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
isbn = {978-1-4503-4139-4},
author = {Cuff, Paul and Yu, Lanqing}
}
@article{debreuNonnegativeSquareMatrices1953,
title = {Nonnegative {{Square Matrices}}},
year = {1953},
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {21},
number = {4},
eprint = {1907925},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {597--607},
publisher = {[Wiley, Econometric Society]},
issn = {0012-9682},
doi = {10.2307/1907925},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907925},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
author = {Debreu, Gerard and Herstein, I. N.}
}
@article{debreuSocialEquilibriumExistence1952,
title = {A {{Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem}}*},
year = {1952},
month = oct,
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
volume = {38},
number = {10},
pages = {886--893},
publisher = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.38.10.886},
url = {https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.38.10.886},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Debreu, Gerard}
}
@misc{deepseek-aiDeepSeekR1IncentivizingReasoning2025,
title = {{{DeepSeek-R1}}: {{Incentivizing Reasoning Capability}} in {{LLMs}} via {{Reinforcement Learning}}},
shorttitle = {{{DeepSeek-R1}}},
year = {2025},
month = jan,
number = {arXiv:2501.12948},
eprint = {2501.12948},
publisher = {arXiv},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2501.12948},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12948},
urldate = {2025-04-19},
abstract = {We introduce our first-generation reasoning models, DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1. DeepSeek-R1-Zero, a model trained via large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) without supervised fine-tuning (SFT) as a preliminary step, demonstrates remarkable reasoning capabilities. Through RL, DeepSeek-R1-Zero naturally emerges with numerous powerful and intriguing reasoning behaviors. However, it encounters challenges such as poor readability, and language mixing. To address these issues and further enhance reasoning performance, we introduce DeepSeek-R1, which incorporates multi-stage training and cold-start data before RL. DeepSeek-R1 achieves performance comparable to OpenAI-o1-1217 on reasoning tasks. To support the research community, we open-source DeepSeek-R1-Zero, DeepSeek-R1, and six dense models (1.5B, 7B, 8B, 14B, 32B, 70B) distilled from DeepSeek-R1 based on Qwen and Llama.},
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
keywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science - Computation and Language,Computer Science - Machine Learning},
author = {{DeepSeek-AI} and Guo, Daya and Yang, Dejian and Zhang, Haowei and Song, Junxiao and Zhang, Ruoyu and Xu, Runxin and Zhu, Qihao and Ma, Shirong and Wang, Peiyi and Bi, Xiao and Zhang, Xiaokang and Yu, Xingkai and Wu, Yu and Wu, Z. F. and Gou, Zhibin and Shao, Zhihong and Li, Zhuoshu and Gao, Ziyi and others}
}
@book{definettiTheoryProbabilityCritical2017,
title = {Theory of {{Probability}}: {{A Critical Introductory Treatment}}},
shorttitle = {Theory of {{Probability}}},
year = {2017},
month = feb,
series = {Wiley {{Series}} in {{Probability}} and {{Statistics}}},
edition = {1},
publisher = {Wiley},
doi = {10.1002/9781119286387},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119286387},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {Part 7 A preliminary survey: heads and tails - preliminary considerations heads and tails - the random process laws of "large numbers" the "central limit theorem". Part 8 Random processes with independent increments: the case of asymptotic normality the Wiener-Levy process behaviour and asymptotic behaviour ruin problems ballot problems. Part 9 An introduction to other types of stochastic process: Markov processes stationary processes. Part 10 Problems in higher dimensions: second-order characteristics and the normal distribution the discrete case the continuous case the case of spherical symmetry. Part 11 Inductive reasoning, statistical inference: the basic formulation and preliminary clarifications the case of independence and the case of dependence exchangeability. Part 12 Mathematical statistics: the scope and limits of the treatment the likelihood principle and sufficient statistics a Bayesian approach to "estimation" and "hypothesis testing" the connections with decision theory.},
copyright = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm\_license\_1.1},
isbn = {978-1-119-28637-0 978-1-119-28638-7},
author = {{de Finetti}, Bruno},
editor = {Machí, Antonio and Smith, Adrian}
}
@article{dekelStandardStateSpaceModels1998,
title = {Standard {{State-Space Models Preclude Unawareness}}},
year = {1998},
month = jan,
journal = {Econometrica},
volume = {66},
number = {1},
eprint = {2998545},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {159},
issn = {00129682},
doi = {10.2307/2998545},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2998545?origin=crossref},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Dekel, Eddie and Lipman, Barton L. and Rustichini, Aldo}
}
@article{delongPrimateModelsMovement1990,
title = {Primate Models of Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin},
year = {1990},
month = jul,
journal = {Trends in Neurosciences},
volume = {13},
number = {7},
pages = {281--285},
issn = {0166-2236},
doi = {10.1016/0166-2236(90)90110-V},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016622369090110V},
urldate = {2024-08-06},
abstract = {Movement disorders associated with basal ganglia dysfunction comprise a spectrum of abnormalities that range from the hypokinetic disorders (of which Parkinson's disease is the best-known example) at one extreme to the hyperkinetic disorders (exemplified by Huntington's disease and hemiballismus) at the other. Both extremes of this movement disorder spectrum can be accounted for by postulating specific disturbances within the basal ganglia-thalamocortical ‘motor’ circuit. In this paper, Mahlon DeLong describes the changes in neuronal activity in the motor circuit in animal models of hypo- and hyperkinetic disorders.},
author = {DeLong, Mahlon R.}
}
@article{dengComplexityComputingMarkov2023,
title = {On the Complexity of Computing {{Markov}} Perfect Equilibrium in General-Sum Stochastic Games},
year = {2023},
month = jan,
journal = {National Science Review},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {nwac256},
issn = {2095-5138},
doi = {10.1093/nsr/nwac256},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac256},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Similar to the role of Markov decision processes in reinforcement learning, Markov games (also called stochastic games) lay down the foundation for the study of multi-agent reinforcement learning and sequential agent interactions. We introduce approximate Markov perfect equilibrium as a solution to the computational problem of finite-state stochastic games repeated in the infinite horizon and prove its PPAD-completeness. This solution concept preserves the Markov perfect property and opens up the possibility for the success of multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms on static two-player games to be extended to multi-agent dynamic games, expanding the reign of the PPAD-complete class.},
author = {Deng, Xiaotie and Li, Ningyuan and Mguni, David and Wang, Jun and Yang, Yaodong}
}
@article{diaconisFiniteExchangeableSequences1980,
title = {Finite {{Exchangeable Sequences}}},
year = {1980},
month = aug,
journal = {The Annals of Probability},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {745--764},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics},
issn = {0091-1798, 2168-894X},
doi = {10.1214/aop/1176994663},
url = {https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-probability/volume-8/issue-4/Finite-Exchangeable-Sequences/10.1214/aop/1176994663.full},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {Let \$X\_1, X\_2,\textbackslash cdots, X\_k, X\_\{k+1\},\textbackslash cdots, X\_n\$ be exchangeable random variables taking values in the set \$S\$. The variation distance between the distribution of \$X\_1, X\_2,\textbackslash cdots, X\_k\$ and the closest mixture of independent, identically distributed random variables is shown to be at most \$2 ck/n\$, where \$c\$ is the cardinality of \$S\$. If \$c\$ is infinite, the bound \$k(k - 1)/n\$ is obtained. These results imply the most general known forms of de Finetti's theorem. Examples are given to show that the rates \$k/n\$ and \$k(k - 1)/n\$ cannot be improved. The main tool is a bound on the variation distance between sampling with and without replacement. For instance, suppose an urn contains \$n\$ balls, each marked with some element of the set \$S\$, whose cardinality \$c\$ is finite. Now \$k\$ draws are made at random from this urn, either with or without replacement. This generates two probability distributions on the set of \$k\$-tuples, and the variation distance between them is at most \$2 ck/n\$.},
keywords = {60G10,60J05,De Finetti's theorem,Exchangeable,extreme points,presentable,representable,sampling with and without replacement,Symmetric,variation distance},
author = {Diaconis, P. and Freedman, D.}
}
@book{durrettProbabilityTheoryExamples2019,
title = {Probability: {{Theory}} and {{Examples}}},
shorttitle = {Probability},
year = {2019},
series = {Cambridge {{Series}} in {{Statistical}} and {{Probabilistic Mathematics}}},
edition = {5},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
doi = {10.1017/9781108591034},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/probability/DD9A1907F810BB14CCFF022CDFC5677A},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {This lively introduction to measure-theoretic probability theory covers laws of large numbers, central limit theorems, random walks, martingales, Markov chains, ergodic theorems, and Brownian motion. Concentrating on results that are the most useful for applications, this comprehensive treatment is a rigorous graduate text and reference. Operating under the philosophy that the best way to learn probability is to see it in action, the book contains extended examples that apply the theory to concrete applications. This fifth edition contains a new chapter on multidimensional Brownian motion and its relationship to partial differential equations (PDEs), an advanced topic that is finding new applications. Setting the foundation for this expansion, Chapter 7 now features a proof of Itô's formula. Key exercises that previously were simply proofs left to the reader have been directly inserted into the text as lemmas. The new edition re-instates discussion about the central limit theorem for martingales and stationary sequences.},
isbn = {978-1-108-47368-2},
author = {Durrett, Rick}
}
@article{dworkAlgorithmicFoundationsDifferential2013,
title = {The {{Algorithmic Foundations}} of {{Differential Privacy}}},
year = {2013},
journal = {Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science},
volume = {9},
number = {3-4},
pages = {211--407},
issn = {1551-305X, 1551-3068},
doi = {10.1561/0400000042},
url = {http://www.nowpublishers.com/articles/foundations-and-trends-in-theoretical-computer-science/TCS-042},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
author = {Dwork, Cynthia and Roth, Aaron}
}
@inproceedings{dworkCalibratingNoiseSensitivity2006,
title = {Calibrating {{Noise}} to {{Sensitivity}} in {{Private Data Analysis}}},
booktitle = {Theory of {{Cryptography}}},
year = {2006},
pages = {265--284},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
doi = {10.1007/11681878_14},
abstract = {We continue a line of research initiated in [10,11]on privacy-preserving statistical databases. Consider a trusted server that holds a database of sensitive information. Given a query function f mapping databases to reals, the so-called true answer is the result of applying f to the database. To protect privacy, the true answer is perturbed by the addition of random noise generated according to a carefully chosen distribution, and this response, the true answer plus noise, is returned to the user.},
isbn = {978-3-540-32732-5},
keywords = {Laplace Distribution,Privacy Breach,Query Function,Semantic Security,True Answer},
author = {Dwork, Cynthia and McSherry, Frank and Nissim, Kobbi and Smith, Adam},
editor = {Halevi, Shai and Rabin, Tal}
}
@inproceedings{emersonCharacterizingCorrectnessProperties1980,
title = {Characterizing Correctness Properties of Parallel Programs Using Fixpoints},
booktitle = {Automata, {{Languages}} and {{Programming}}},
year = {1980},
pages = {169--181},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
doi = {10.1007/3-540-10003-2_69},
abstract = {We have shown that correctness properties of parallel programs can be described using computation trees and that from these descriptions fixpoint characterizations can be generated. We have also given conditions on the form of computation tree descriptions to ensure that a correctness property can be characterized using continuous fixpoints. A consequence is that a correctness property such as inevitability under fair scheduling can be characterized as the least fixpoint of a monotonic, noncontinuous transformer, but cannot be characterized using fixpoints of continuous transformers (nor as the greatest fixpoint of a monotonic transformer of any degree of complexity lower than fair inevitability itself). Hence, currently known proof rules are not applicable (see however [FS80]). We are now investigating whether useful proof rules can exist for correctness properties having only a monotonic, noncontinuous least fixpoint characterization. In addition, we are examining alternate notions of fairness which do have continuous fixpoint characterizations.},
isbn = {978-3-540-39346-7},
author = {Emerson, E. Allen and Clarke, Edmund M.},
editor = {{de Bakker}, Jaco and {van Leeuwen}, Jan}
}
@book{faginReasoningKnowledge2003,
title = {Reasoning {{About Knowledge}}},
year = {2003},
month = dec,
publisher = {The MIT Press},
url = {https://book.douban.com/subject/2802062/},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Reasoning about knowledge--particularly the knowledge of agents who reason about the world and each other's knowledge--was once the exclusive province of philosophers and puzzle solvers. More recently, this type of reasoning has been shown to play a key role in a surprising number of contexts, from understanding conversations to the analysis of distributed computer algorithms.R..., (展开全部)},
isbn = {978-0-262-56200-3},
author = {Fagin, Ronald and Halpern, Joseph Y. and Moses, Yoram and Vardi, Moshe Y.}
}
@article{fanFixedPointMinimaxTheorems1952,
title = {Fixed-{{Point}} and {{Minimax Theorems}} in {{Locally Convex Topological Linear Spaces}}},
year = {1952},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
volume = {38},
number = {2},
eprint = {88613},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {121--126},
publisher = {National Academy of Sciences},
issn = {0027-8424},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/88613},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Fan, Ky}
}
@article{frobeniusUberMatrizenAus1912,
title = {Über {{Matrizen}} Aus Nicht Negativen {{Elementen}}},
year = {1912},
publisher = {Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin},
url = {https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Ueber_Matrizen_aus_nicht_negativen_Elementen.pdf},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Frobenius, Georg and Frobenius, Ferdinand Georg and Frobenius, Ferdinand Georg and Frobenius, Ferdinand Georg and Mathematician, Germany}
}
@book{fudenbergGameTheory1991,
title = {Game {{Theory}}},
year = {1991},
month = aug,
publisher = {The MIT Press},
url = {https://book.douban.com/subject/1473880/},
urldate = {2023-09-14},
isbn = {978-0-262-06141-4},
keywords = {Game theory},
author = {Fudenberg, Drew and Tirole, Jean}
}
@book{gamowPuzzlemath1958,
title = {Puzzle-Math},
year = {1958},
month = feb,
edition = {First Edition},
publisher = {Viking Adult},
abstract = {Book by George Gamow, Marvin Stern},
isbn = {978-0-670-58335-5},
author = {Gamow, George and Stern, Marvin}
}
@incollection{garsonModalLogic2024,
title = {Modal {{Logic}}},
booktitle = {The {{Stanford Encyclopedia}} of {{Philosophy}}},
year = {2024},
edition = {Spring 2024},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
url = {https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/logic-modal/},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {A modal is an expression (like ‘necessarily’ or‘possibly’) that is used to qualify the truth of ajudgement. Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of thedeductive behavior of the expressions ‘it is necessarythat’ and ‘it is possible that’. However, the term‘modal logic’ may be used more broadly for a family ofrelated systems. These include logics for belief, for tense and othertemporal expressions, for the deontic (moral) expressions such as‘it is obligatory that’ and ‘it is permittedthat’, and many others. An understanding of modal logic isparticularly valuable in the formal analysis of philosophicalargument, where expressions from the modal family are both common andconfusing. Modal logic also has important applications in computerscience.},
keywords = {logic history of: modal logic,logic: classical,logic: deontic,logic: free,logic: provability,logic: relevance,logic: temporal,possibilism-actualism debate,possible worlds},
author = {Garson, James},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri}
}
@book{gazzanigaCognitiveNeuroscienceBiology2018,
title = {Cognitive {{Neuroscience}}: {{The Biology}} of the {{Mind}}},
shorttitle = {Cognitive {{Neuroscience}}},
year = {2018},
month = dec,
edition = {Fifth edition},
publisher = {W. W. Norton \& Company},
abstract = {Authoritative, applied, and accessible Written by world-renowned researchers, including Michael Gazzaniga, Cognitive Neuroscience remains the gold standard in its field, showcasing the latest discoveries and clinical applications. In its new Fifth Edition, updated material is woven into the narrative of each chapter and featured in new Hot Science and Lessons from the Clinic sections. The presentation is also more accessible and focused as the result of Anatomical Orientation figures, Take-Home Message features, and streamlined chapter openers.},
isbn = {978-0-393-60317-0},
author = {Gazzaniga, Michael and Ivry, Richard B. and Ph.D, George R. Mangun}
}
@article{glicksbergFurtherGeneralizationKakutani1952,
title = {A {{Further Generalization}} of the {{Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem}}, with {{Application}} to {{Nash Equilibrium Points}}},
year = {1952},
month = feb,
journal = {Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
eprint = {2032478},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {170},
issn = {00029939},
doi = {10.2307/2032478},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2032478?origin=crossref},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
author = {Glicksberg, I. L.}
}
@inproceedings{goldwasserKnowledgeComplexityInteractive1985,
title = {The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof-Systems},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual {{ACM}} Symposium on {{Theory}} of Computing},
year = {1985},
month = dec,
series = {{{STOC}} '85},
pages = {291--304},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
doi = {10.1145/22145.22178},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/22145.22178},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
isbn = {978-0-89791-151-1},
author = {Goldwasser, S and Micali, S and Rackoff, C}
}
@inproceedings{goodfellowGenerativeAdversarialNets2014,
title = {Generative {{Adversarial Nets}}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 28th {{International Conference}} on {{Neural Information Processing Systems}} - {{Volume}} 2},
year = {2014},
volume = {27},
publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},
url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2014/hash/5ca3e9b122f61f8f06494c97b1afccf3-Abstract.html},
urldate = {2023-12-19},
abstract = {We propose a new framework for estimating generative models via adversarial nets, in which we simultaneously train two models: a generative model G that captures the data distribution, and a discriminative model D that estimates the probability that a sample came from the training data rather than G. The training procedure for G is to maximize the probability of D making a mistake. This framework corresponds to a minimax two-player game. In the space of arbitrary functions G and D, a unique solution exists, with G recovering the training data distribution and D equal to 1/2 everywhere. In the case where G and D are defined by multilayer perceptrons, the entire system can be trained with backpropagation. There is no need for any Markov chains or unrolled approximate inference networks during either training or generation of samples. Experiments demonstrate the potential of the framework through qualitative and quantitatively evaluation of the generated samples.},
author = {Goodfellow, Ian and {Pouget-Abadie}, Jean and Mirza, Mehdi and Xu, Bing and {Warde-Farley}, David and Ozair, Sherjil and Courville, Aaron and Bengio, Yoshua}
}
@article{greenbergUnrelatedQuestionRandomized1969,
title = {The {{Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model}}: {{Theoretical Framework}}},
shorttitle = {The {{Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model}}},
year = {1969},
month = jun,
journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},
volume = {64},
number = {326},
pages = {520--539},
publisher = {ASA Website},
issn = {0162-1459},
doi = {10.1080/01621459.1969.10500991},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500991},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
abstract = {This paper develops a theoretical framework for the unrelated question randomized response technique suggested by Walt R. Simmons. The statistical efficiency of this technique is compared with the Warner technique under situations of both truthful and untruthful responses. Methods of allocating the total sample to each of two subsamples required by the unrelated question approach are developed. Recommendations are made concerning choices of values for those parameters which can be assigned at the discretion of the investigator.},
author = {Greenberg, Bernard G. and {Abul-Ela}, Abdel-Latif A. and Simmons, Walt R. and Horvitz, Daniel G.}
}
@incollection{hajekInterpretationsProbability2023,
title = {Interpretations of {{Probability}}},
booktitle = {The {{Stanford Encyclopedia}} of {{Philosophy}}},
year = {2023},
edition = {Winter 2023},
publisher = {Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University},
url = {https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/probability-interpret/},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {One regularly reads and hears probabilistic claims like the following:},
keywords = {Carnap Rudolf,causal models,causation: probabilistic,chance: versus randomness,decision theory,disagreement,Dutch book arguments,epistemology: Bayesian,information,Laplace Pierre Simon,logic: inductive,Popper Karl,probability in medieval and Renaissance philosophy,quantum theory: philosophical issues in,Ramsey Frank,Reichenbach Hans,self-locating beliefs,statistics philosophy of},
author = {Hájek, Alan},
editor = {Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri}
}
@article{halpernKnowledgeCommonKnowledge1990,
title = {Knowledge and Common Knowledge in a Distributed Environment},
year = {1990},
month = jul,
journal = {J. ACM},
volume = {37},
number = {3},
pages = {549--587},
issn = {0004-5411},
doi = {10.1145/79147.79161},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/79147.79161},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Reasoning about knowledge seems to play a fundamental role in distributed systems. Indeed, such reasoning is a central part of the informal intuitive arguments used in the design of distributed protocols. Communication in a distributed system can be viewed as the act of transforming the system's state of knowledge. This paper presents a general framework for formalizing and reasoning about knowledge in distributed systems. It is shown that states of knowledge of groups of processors are useful concepts for the design and analysis of distributed protocols. In particular, distributed knowledge corresponds to knowledge that is “distributed” among the members of the group, while common knowledge corresponds to a fact being “publicly known.” The relationship between common knowledge and a variety of desirable actions in a distributed system is illustrated. Furthermore, it is shown that, formally speaking, in practical systems common knowledge cannot be attained. A number of weaker variants of common knowledge that are attainable in many cases of interest are introduced and investigated.},
author = {Halpern, Joseph Y. and Moses, Yoram}
}
@book{hamiltonLogicMathematicians1988,
title = {Logic for {{Mathematicians}}},
year = {1988},
month = oct,
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
url = {https://book.douban.com/subject/1783332/},
urldate = {2025-02-13},
abstract = {Here is an introductory textbook which is designed to be useful not only to intending logicians but also to mathematicians in general. Based on Dr Hamilton's lectures to third and fourth year undergraduate mathematicians at the University of Stirling it has been written to introduce student or professional mathematicians, whose background need cover no more than a typical first..., (展开全部)},
isbn = {978-0-521-36865-0},
author = {Hamilton, A. G.}
}
@article{hanusChimpanzeeProblemsolvingContrasting2011,
title = {Chimpanzee Problem-Solving: Contrasting the Use of Causal and Arbitrary Cues},
shorttitle = {Chimpanzee Problem-Solving},
year = {2011},
month = nov,
journal = {Animal Cognition},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
pages = {871--878},
issn = {1435-9456},
doi = {10.1007/s10071-011-0421-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0421-6},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Humans are able to benefit from a causally structured problem-solving context rather than arbitrarily structured situations. In order to better understand nonhuman causal cognition, it is therefore important to isolate crucial factors that might differentiate between events that follow a purely spatial and temporal contingency and those that hold a “true” causal relationship. In the first of two experiments, chimpanzee subjects were required to detect a bottle containing juice from five opaque bottles of equal shape and size. In the causal condition, the juice bottle looked identical to the other four bottles, only it was much heavier than the others. In the arbitrary condition, the weight of all five bottles was identical, but the juice bottle was color-marked differently. Since bottle opening was made difficult (and therefore costly), the question was whether subject’s manipulative behavior would be random or somehow influenced by the nature of the provided information. Our results show that subjects detected and opened the juice bottle significantly faster when weight was the discriminating feature (causal condition) compared to situations in which the discrimination was necessarily based on a color-cue (arbitrary condition). Experiment 2 ruled out the possibility of a general learning bias toward tactile rather than visual information in chimpanzees. When tested in a simple exchange paradigm that prevented any use of causal information, no predominance of a tactile cue (weight) over a visual cue (color) could be found. Furthermore—and in contrast to the causal condition in Experiment 1—no learning occurred during the course of Experiment 2, neither in the weight nor in the color condition. We therefore conclude that chimpanzees can more easily determine the content of an object based on its causal properties compared to situations in which the only available information is a pure arbitrary regularity. This supports the view that chimpanzees’ causal cognition does not rely on mere perceptual information but also on structural abstraction about their physical environment.},
keywords = {Arbitrary cues,Causal cognition,Causal cues,Chimpanzees,Problem-solving},
author = {Hanus, Daniel and Call, Josep}
}
@article{harsanyiGamesIncompleteInformation1967,
title = {Games with {{Incomplete Information Played}} by "{{Bayesian}}" {{Players}}, {{I-III}}. {{Part I}}. {{The Basic Model}}},
year = {1967},
journal = {Management Science},
volume = {14},
number = {3},
eprint = {2628393},
eprinttype = {jstor},
pages = {159--182},
publisher = {INFORMS},
issn = {0025-1909},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/2628393},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {The paper develops a new theory for the analysis of games with incomplete information where the players are uncertain about some important parameters of the game situation, such as the payoff functions, the strategies available to various players, the information other players have about the game, etc. However, each player has a subjective probability distribution over the alternative possibilities. In most of the paper it is assumed that these probability distributions entertained by the different players are mutually "consistent", in the sense that they can be regarded as conditional probability distributions derived from a certain "basic probability distribution" over the parameters unknown to the various players. But later the theory is extended also to cases where the different players' subjective probability distributions fail to satisfy this consistency assumption. In cases where the consistency assumption holds, the original game can be replaced by a game where nature first conducts a lottery in accordance with the basic probablity distribution, and the outcome of this lottery will decide which particular subgame will be played, i.e., what the actual values of the relevant parameters will be in the game. Yet, each player will receive only partial information about the outcome of the lottery, and about the values of these parameters. However, every player will know the "basic probability distribution" governing the lottery. Thus, technically, the resulting game will be a game with complete information. It is called the Bayes-equivalent of the original game. Part I of the paper describes the basic model and discusses various intuitive interpretations for the latter. Part II shows that the Nash equilibrium points of the Bayes-equivalent game yield "Bayesian equilibrium points" for the original game. Finally, Part III considers the main properties of the "basic probablity distribution".},
author = {Harsanyi, John C.}
}
@article{harsanyiGamesIncompleteInformation1968,
title = {Games with {{Incomplete Information Played}} by "{{Bayesian}}" {{Players Part II}}. {{Bayesian Equilibrium Points}}},
year = {1968},
month = jan,
journal = {Management Science},
volume = {14},
number = {5},
pages = {320--334},
publisher = {INFORMS},
issn = {0025-1909},
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.14.5.320},
url = {https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.14.5.320},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Part I of this paper has described a new theory for the analysis of games with incomplete information. It has been shown that, if the various players' subjective probability distributions satisfy a certain mutual-consistency requirement, then any given game with incomplete information will be equivalent to a certain game with complete information, called the “Bayes-equivalent” of the original game, or briefly a “Bayesian game.” Part II of the paper will now show that any Nash equilibrium point of this Bayesian game yields a “Bayesian equilibrium point” for the original game and conversely. This result will then be illustrated by numerical examples, representing two-person zero-sum games with incomplete information. We shall also show how our theory enables us to analyze the problem of exploiting the opponent's erroneous beliefs. However, apart from its indubitable usefulness in locating Bayesian equilibrium points, we shall show it on a numerical example (the Bayes-equivalent of a two-person cooperative game) that the normal form of a Bayesian game is in many cases a highly unsatisfactory representation of the game situation and has to be replaced by other representations (e.g., by the semi-normal form). We shall argue that this rather unexpected result is due to the fact that Bayesian games must be interpreted as games with “delayed commitment” whereas the normal-form representation always envisages a game with “immediate commitment.”},
author = {Harsanyi, John C.}
}
@article{harsanyiGamesIncompleteInformation1968a,
title = {Games with {{Incomplete Information Played}} by "{{Bayesian}}" {{Players}}, {{Part III}}. {{The Basic Probability Distribution}} of the {{Game}}},
year = {1968},
month = mar,
journal = {Management Science},
volume = {14},
number = {7},
pages = {486--502},
publisher = {INFORMS},
issn = {0025-1909},
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486},
url = {https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Parts I and II of this paper have described a new theory for the analysis of games with incomplete information. Two cases have been distinguished: consistent games in which there exists some basic probability distribution from which the players' subjective probability distributions can be derived as conditional probability distributions; and inconsistent games in which no such basic probability distribution exists. Part III will now show that in consistent games, where a basic probability distribution exists, it is essentially unique. It will also be argued that, in the absence of special reasons to the contrary, one should try to analyze any given game situation with incomplete information in terms of a consistent-game model. However, it will be shown that our theory can be extended also to inconsistent games, in case the situation does require the use of an inconsistent-game model.},
author = {Harsanyi, John C.}
}
@article{harsanyiGamesRandomlyDisturbed1973,
title = {Games with Randomly Disturbed Payoffs: {{A}} New Rationale for Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium Points},
shorttitle = {Games with Randomly Disturbed Payoffs},
year = {1973},
month = dec,
journal = {International Journal of Game Theory},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {1--23},
issn = {1432-1270},
doi = {10.1007/BF01737554},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737554},
urldate = {2025-02-15},
abstract = {Equilibrium points in mixed strategies seem to be unstable, because any player can deviate without penalty from his equilibrium strategy even if he expects all other players to stick to theirs. This paper proposes a model under which most mixed-strategy equilibrium points have full stability. It is argued that for any gameΓ the players' uncertainty about the other players' exact payoffs can be modeled as a disturbed gameΓ*, i.e., as a game with small random fluctuations in the payoffs. Any equilibrium point inΓ, whether it is in pure or in mixed strategies, can “almost always” be obtained as a limit of a pure-strategy equilibrium point in the corresponding disturbed gameΓ* when all disturbances go to zero. Accordingly, mixed-strategy equilibrium points are stable — even though the players may make no deliberate effort to use their pure strategies with the probability weights prescribed by their mixed equilibrium strategies — because the random fluctuations in their payoffs willmake them use their pure strategies approximately with the prescribed probabilities.},
keywords = {Economic Theory,Equilibrium Point,Game Theory,Mixed Strategy,Pure Strategy},
author = {Harsanyi, John C.}
}
@book{hastieElementsStatisticalLearning2009,
title = {The {{Elements}} of {{Statistical Learning}}},
year = {2009},
series = {Springer {{Series}} in {{Statistics}}},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {New York, NY},
doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7},
urldate = {2025-02-14},
copyright = {http://www.springer.com/tdm},
isbn = {978-0-387-84857-0 978-0-387-84858-7},
keywords = {Averaging,Boosting,classification,clustering,data mining,machine learning,Projection pursuit,Random Forest,supervised learning,Support Vector Machine,unsupervised learning},
author = {Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert and Friedman, Jerome}
}
@book{hatcherAlgebraicTopology2001,
title = {Algebraic {{Topology}}},
year = {2001},
month = dec,
edition = {1st edition},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
abstract = {In most major universities one of the three or four basic first year graduate mathematics courses is algebraic topology. This introductory text is suitable for use in a course on the subject or for self study, featuring broad coverage and a readable exposition, with many examples and exercises. The four main chapters present the basics: fundamental group and covering spaces, homology and cohomology, higher homotopy groups, and homotopy theory generally. The author emphasizes the geometric aspects of the subject, which helps students gain intuition. A unique feature is the inclusion of many optional topics not usually part of a first course due to time constraints: Bockstein and transfer homomorphisms, direct and inverse limits, H spaces and Hopf algebras, the Brown representability theorem, the James reduced product, the Dold Thom theorem, and Steenrod squares and powers.},
isbn = {978-0-521-79540-1},
author = {Hatcher, Allen}
}