Fix #119, #182, and #185

[christian-oreilly]

Closes #119
Closes #182
Closes #185

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.44444% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.45%. Comparing base (c647153) to head (f47f474).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pylossless/dash/mne_visualizer.py	63.15%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.81%   83.45%   +2.63%     
==========================================
  Files          22       26       +4     
  Lines        1282     1698     +416     
==========================================
+ Hits         1036     1417     +381     
- Misses        246      281      +35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[scott-huberty]

Thanks @christian-oreilly 🚀

Not for this PR - but we might consider Moving these EDF files out of this REPO, and adding a fetch_example_data function to test them (or something similar).

My concern is that each time we make a change to these files, git is going to keepi an archive somewhere, which could cause performance issues (for git operations) if our repo size starts to balloon because of multiple archives of these EDF files.

WDYT?

[christian-oreilly]

@scott-huberty Totally agree. I'll create an issue on that so that we keep it on the radar.