Skip to content

[Extensions] Support higher level webauthn extensions #82

Description

@msirringhaus

We should also process WebAuthn extensions. These are defined as client extensions, so they should fit right in - we can possibly prefix these with WebAuthn (eg. WebAuthnPRFExtension for my favourite extension, Pseudo-random function extension (prf).

Originally posted by @AlfioEmanueleFresta in #77 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions