Litestar maintains a suite of DTO factory types that can be used to create DTOs for use with popular data modelling libraries, such as ORMs. These take a model type as a generic type argument, and create subtypes of :class:`AbstractDTO <litestar.dto.base_dto.AbstractDTO>` that support conversion of that model type to and from raw bytes.
The following factories are currently available:
- :class:`DataclassDTO <litestar.dto.dataclass_dto.DataclassDTO>`
- :class:`MsgspecDTO <litestar.dto.msgspec_dto.MsgspecDTO>`
- :class:`PydanticDTO <litestar.plugins.pydantic.PydanticDTO>`
- :class:`SQLAlchemyDTO <advanced_alchemy.extensions.litestar.dto.SQLAlchemyDTO>`
DTO factories are used to create DTOs for use with a particular data modelling library. The following example creates a DTO for use with an SQLAlchemy model:
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/simple_dto_factory_example.py :caption: An SQLAlchemy model DTO :language: python
Here we see that an SQLAlchemy model is used as both the data
and return annotation for the handler, and while
Litestar does not natively support encoding/decoding to/from SQLAlchemy models, through
:class:`SQLAlchemyDTO <advanced_alchemy.extensions.litestar.dto.SQLAlchemyDTO>` we can do this.
However, we do have some issues with the above example. Firstly, the user's password has been returned to them in the
response from the handler. Secondly, the user is able to set the created_at
field on the model, which should only
ever be set once, and defined internally.
Let's explore how we can configure DTOs to manage scenarios like these.
The :func:`dto_field <litestar.dto.field.dto_field>` function can be used to mark model attributes with DTO-based configuration.
Fields marked as "private"
or "read-only"
will not be parsed from client data into the user model, and
"private"
fields are never serialized into return data.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/marking_fields.py :caption: Marking fields :language: python :emphasize-lines: 6,14,15 :linenos:
Note that id
field is the primary key and is handled specially by the defined SQLAlchemy base.
Fields can be explicitly excluded using :class:`DTOConfig <litestar.dto.config.DTOConfig>`.
The following example demonstrates excluding attributes from the serialized response, including excluding fields from nested models.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/excluding_fields.py :caption: Excluding fields :language: python :emphasize-lines: 6,10,37-46,49 :linenos:
Here, the config is created with the exclude parameter, which is a set of strings. Each string represents the path to a
field in the User
object that should be excluded from the output DTO.
config = DTOConfig(
exclude={
"id",
"address.id",
"address.street",
"pets.0.id",
"pets.0.user_id",
}
)
In this example, "id"
represents the id field of the User
object, "address.id"
and "address.street"
represent fields of the Address
object nested inside the User
object, and "pets.0.id"
and
"pets.0.user_id"
represent fields of the Pets
objects nested within the list of User.pets
.
Note
Given a generic type, with an arbitrary number of type parameters (e.g., GenericType[Type0, Type1, ..., TypeN]
),
we use the index of the type parameter to indicate which type the exclusion should refer to. For example, a.0.b
,
excludes the b
field from the first type parameter of a
, a.1.b
excludes the b
field from the second
type parameter of a
, and so on.
Fields can be renamed using :class:`DTOConfig <litestar.dto.config.DTOConfig>`. The following example uses the name
userName
client-side, and user
internally.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/renaming_fields.py :caption: Renaming fields :language: python :emphasize-lines: 4,8,19,20,24 :linenos:
Fields can also be renamed using a renaming strategy that will be applied to all fields. The following example uses a pre-defined rename strategy that will convert all field names to camel case on client-side.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/renaming_all_fields.py :caption: Renaming fields :language: python :emphasize-lines: 4,8,19,20,21,22,24 :linenos:
Fields that are directly renamed using rename_fields mapping will be excluded from rename_strategy.
The rename strategy either accepts one of the pre-defined strategies: "camel", "pascal", "upper", "lower", "kebab", or it can be provided a callback that accepts the field name as a string argument and should return a string.
Factories check that the types to which they are assigned are a subclass of the type provided as the generic type to the
DTO factory. This means that if you have a handler that accepts a User
model, and you assign a UserDTO
factory
to it, the DTO will only accept User
types for "data" and return types.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/type_checking.py :caption: Type checking :language: python :emphasize-lines: 25,26,31 :linenos:
In the above example, the handler is declared to use UserDTO
which has been type-narrowed with the User
type.
However, we annotate the handler with the Foo
type. This will raise an error such as this at runtime:
litestar.exceptions.dto.InvalidAnnotationException: DTO narrowed with '<class 'docs.examples.data_transfer_objects.factory.type_checking.User'>', handler type is '<class 'docs.examples.data_transfer_objects.factory.type_checking.Foo'>'
The depth of related items parsed from client data and serialized into return data can be controlled using the
max_nested_depth
parameter to :class:`DTOConfig <litestar.dto.config.DTOConfig>`.
In this example, we set max_nested_depth=0
for the DTO that handles inbound client data, and leave it at the default
of 1
for the return DTO.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/related_items.py :caption: Type checking :language: python :emphasize-lines: 25,35,39 :linenos:
When the handler receives the client data, we can see that the b
field has not been parsed into the A
model that
is injected for our data parameter (line 35).
We then add a B
instance to the data (line 39), which includes a reference back to a
, and from inspection of the
return data can see that b
is included in the response data, however b.a
is not, due to the default
max_nested_depth
of 1
.
By default, DTOs will silently ignore unknown fields in the source data. This behaviour
can be configured using the forbid_unknown_fields
parameter of the
:class:`DTOConfig <litestar.dto.config.DTOConfig>`. When set to True
a validation
error response will be returned if the data contains a field not defined on the model:
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/unknown_fields.py :caption: Type checking :language: python :linenos:
Sometimes we need to be able to access the data that has been parsed and validated by the DTO, but not converted into an instance of our data model.
In the following example, we create a User
model, that is a :func:`dataclass <dataclasses.dataclass>` with 3
required fields: id
, name
, and age
.
We also create a DTO that doesn't allow clients to set the id
field on the User
model and set it on the
handler.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/dto_data_problem_statement.py :language: python :emphasize-lines: 18-21,27 :linenos:
Notice that our User model has a model-level default_factory=uuid4
for id
field. That's why we can decode the client data into this model.
However, in some cases there's no clear way to provide a default this way.
One way to handle this is to create different models, e.g., we might create a UserCreate
model that has no id
field, and decode the client data into that. However, this method can become quite cumbersome when we have a lot of
variability in the data that we accept from clients, for example,
PATCH requests.
This is where the :class:`DTOData <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData>` class comes in. It is a generic class that accepts the type of the data that it will contain, and provides useful methods for interacting with that data.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/dto_data_usage.py :language: python :emphasize-lines: 5,23,25 :linenos:
In the above example, we've injected an instance of :class:`DTOData <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData>` into our handler,
and have used that to create our User
instance, after augmenting the client data with a server generated id
value.
Consult the :class:`Reference Docs <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData>` for more information on the methods available.
To augment data used to instantiate our model instances, we can provide keyword arguments to the :meth:`create_instance() <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData.create_instance>` method.
Sometimes we need to provide values for nested data, for example, when creating a new instance of a model that has a nested model with excluded fields.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/providing_values_for_nested_data.py :language: python :emphasize-lines: 9-12,20,28,34 :linenos:
The double-underscore syntax address__id
passed as a keyword argument to the
:meth:`create_instance() <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData.create_instance>` method call is used to specify a value for a
nested attribute. In this case, it's used to provide a value for the id
attribute of the Address
instance nested
within the Person
instance.
This is a common convention in Python for dealing with nested structures. The double underscore can be interpreted as
"traverse through", so address__id
means "traverse through address to get to its id".
In the context of this script, create_instance(id=1, address__id=2)
is saying "create a new Person
instance from
the client data given an id of 1
, and supplement the client address data with an id of 2
".
PATCH requests are a special case when it comes to data transfer objects. The reason for this is that we need to be able to accept and validate any subset of the model attributes in the client payload, which requires some special handling internally.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/patch_requests.py :language: python :emphasize-lines: 7,20,27,28,30 :linenos:
The PatchDTO
class is defined for the Person
class. The config
attribute of PatchDTO
is set to exclude the
id
field, preventing clients from setting it when updating a person, and the partial
attribute is set to True
,
which allows the DTO to accept a subset of the model attributes.
Inside the handler, the :meth:`DTOData.update_instance <litestar.dto.data_structures.DTOData.update_instance>` method is called
to update the instance of Person
before returning it.
In our request, we update only the name
property of the Person
, from "Peter"
to "Peter Pan"
and receive
the full object - with the modified name - back in the response.
Fields that are named with a leading underscore are considered "private" by default. This means that they will not be parsed from client data, and will not be serialized into return data.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/leading_underscore_private.py :language: python :linenos:
This can be overridden by setting the
:attr:`DTOConfig.leading_underscore_private <litestar.dto.config.DTOConfig.underscore_fields_private>` attribute to
False
.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/leading_underscore_private_override.py :language: python :linenos: :emphasize-lines: 14,15
Litestar's DTO Factory types are versatile enough to manage your data, even when it's nested within generic wrappers.
The following example demonstrates a route handler that returns DTO managed data wrapped in a generic type. The wrapper is used to deliver additional metadata about the response - in this case, a count of the number of items returned. Read on for an explanation of how to do this yourself.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/enveloping_return_data.py :caption: Enveloping Return Data :language: python :linenos:
First, create a generic dataclass to act as your wrapper. This type will contain your data and any additional
attributes you might need. In this example, we have a WithCount
dataclass which has a count
attribute.
The wrapper must be a python generic type with one or more type parameters, and at least one of those type parameters
should describe an instance attribute that will be populated with the data.
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Generic, TypeVar
T = TypeVar("T")
@dataclass
class WithCount(Generic[T]):
count: int
data: List[T]
Now, create a DTO for your data object and configure it using DTOConfig
. In this example, we're excluding
password
and created_at
from the final output.
from advanced_alchemy.dto import SQLAlchemyDTO
from litestar.dto import DTOConfig
class UserDTO(SQLAlchemyDTO[User]):
config = DTOConfig(exclude={"password", "created_at"})
Then, set up your route handler. This example sets up a /users
endpoint, where a list of User
objects is
returned, wrapped in the WithCount
dataclass.
from litestar import get
@get("/users", dto=UserDTO, sync_to_thread=False)
def get_users() -> WithCount[User]:
return WithCount(
count=1,
data=[
User(
id=1,
name="Litestar User",
password="xyz",
created_at=datetime.now(),
),
],
)
This setup allows the DTO to manage the rendering of User
objects into the response. The DTO Factory type will find
the attribute on the wrapper type that holds the data and perform its serialization operations upon it.
Returning enveloped data is subject to the following constraints:
- The type returned from the handler must be a type that Litestar can natively encode.
- There can be multiple type arguments to the generic wrapper type, but there must be exactly one type argument to the generic wrapper that is a type supported by the DTO.
Litestar offers paginated response wrapper types, and DTO Factory types can handle this out of the box.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/paginated_return_data.py :caption: Paginated Return Data :language: python :linenos:
The DTO is defined and configured, in our example, we're excluding password
and created_at
fields from the final
representation of our users.
from advanced_alchemy.dto import SQLAlchemyDTO
from litestar.dto import DTOConfig
class UserDTO(SQLAlchemyDTO[User]):
config = DTOConfig(exclude={"password", "created_at"})
The example sets up a /users
endpoint, where a paginated list of User
objects is returned, wrapped in
:class:`ClassicPagination <.pagination.ClassicPagination>`.
from litestar import get
from litestar.pagination import ClassicPagination
@get("/users", dto=UserDTO, sync_to_thread=False)
def get_users() -> ClassicPagination[User]:
return ClassicPagination(
page_size=10,
total_pages=1,
current_page=1,
items=[
User(
id=1,
name="Litestar User",
password="xyz",
created_at=datetime.now(),
),
],
)
The :class:`ClassicPagination <.pagination.ClassicPagination>` class contains page_size
(number of items per page),
total_pages
(total number of pages), current_page
(current page number), and items
(items for the current
page).
The DTO operates on the data contained in the items
attribute, and the pagination wrapper is handled automatically
by Litestar's serialization process.
Litestar's DTO (Data Transfer Object) Factory Types can handle data wrapped in a Response
type.
.. literalinclude:: /examples/data_transfer_objects/factory/response_return_data.py :caption: Response Wrapped Return Data :language: python :linenos:
We create a DTO for the User
type and configure it using DTOConfig
to exclude password
and created_at
from the serialized output.
from advanced_alchemy.dto import SQLAlchemyDTO
from litestar.dto import DTOConfig
class UserDTO(SQLAlchemyDTO[User]):
config = DTOConfig(exclude={"password", "created_at"})
The example sets up a /users
endpoint where a User
object is returned wrapped in a Response
type.
from litestar import get, Response
@get("/users", dto=UserDTO, sync_to_thread=False)
def get_users() -> Response[User]:
return Response(
content=User(
id=1,
name="Litestar User",
password="xyz",
created_at=datetime.now(),
),
headers={"X-Total-Count": "1"},
)
The Response
object encapsulates the User
object in its content
attribute and allows us to configure the
response received by the client. In this case, we add a custom header.