When a component provides templates, consider a naming convention to reflect that origin #65
Description
(Not related to this PR in particular)
When I see this, I’m thinking that it is not obvious where the templates come from.
I’m wondering if we should prefix the templates names (in the like of .base-pipeline-dane, or bp-dane).
Another solution could be to add an input to the base-pipeline component that specifies the list of machines that should be checked. However, then it’s the needs: [dane-up-check] that becomes unclear below.
Originally posted by @adrienbernede in llnl/quandary#106 (comment)