Skip to content

RAW/SDS: Reconsider message and channel id fields for Message type #137

Description

@adklempner

Per @jm-clius (#130 (comment)) :

While we're here, should we review the field types for the rest of the Message? The choice of string for message_id and channel_id was heavily influenced by similar protocols and current Status code, but might not be the most practical from implementation perspective: I can imagine bytes perhaps being more reasonable for message_id and int32 for channel_id.

Any opinions here? cc @shash256

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions