Skip to content

Dimensionality reduction - use of PCs #51

@LineWulff

Description

@LineWulff

Hi,

Thank you for creating this unique ecosystem of different functionalities for HDC!
I am currently using your package to setup analyses for my colleagues.

I was wondering why both runtSNE and runUMAP are based on the PCs? It makes sense for very high-dimensional data like scRNAseq, but for flow data with maybe 30-40 markers, I can't see the point?
Your functions have calculated 35 PCs based on my 35 markers (in a test data set), and if I have to use PCs I would prefer being able to visually inspect the PCs and adjust the number I actually use for further dimensionality reduction. I can see prcomp is used for the PCA itself, but since the total output is not saved in the condor object I can't easily produce an elbowplot.

Preferably I would have loved to be able to A) calculate on marker set or PCs, B) if PCs number of PCs + elbowplot or similar to easily inspect variance across PCs.

Also what is the intention behind moving the pseudobulk PCA that was in your publication? I found that really need for initial inspection of the data.

Best,
Line

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions