RFD 3201: Search relevance weighting v2 #7
lowlydba
started this conversation in
discussion
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Search quality is acceptable for exact RFD numbers but weak for concept-level queries where terms appear in long comment threads. The proposed v2 weighting favors title and summary text, then proposal body, and finally comment bodies with a lower multiplier. We should evaluate this against a fixed benchmark set of 40 representative queries gathered from team usage and compare top-5 precision with the current tuning. Open questions include how aggressively to de-prioritize stale threads and whether archived discussions should receive a recency penalty rather than being filtered entirely.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions