Skip to content

different crop result from paper #4

@pokaaa

Description

@pokaaa

Different from the result reported in the paper of random crop, it turns out that the bit accuracy of crop with ratio 0.9 achieves about 0.6, and ratio 0.7 or less achieves about 0.5.

Did you also achieve this result?

I think this result might be reasonable because the whole latent is divided into chunks of 256 bits, and then voting is done on each position. However, the positions themselves may not correspond to the correct starting point.

Maybe for extraction we need to start from different points and choose the best result? I'm not sure if my analysis is correct.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions