Replies: 1 comment
-
|
You need to implement a new network. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear All, I have a question of using the implementation of PFNN.
I have a 2D heat equation where T(x,y,t) is the solution. And I have a inverse varaible parameter in my BC. The parameter only applies on a particular boundary. so it is supposed to dependent on x only.
In the PFNN implementation. The First NN has x,y,t as inputs and T(x,y,t) as ouput , and second NN also has x,y,t as input and C(x,y,t) as output, as far I understand. But I need the second NN to have x as input and C(x) as output. How do I do this
I have seen the poison equation example, where they had unknown source field as output, and tried to implement it. But the function prediction was not at all correct. https://deepxde.readthedocs.io/en/stable/demos/pinn_inverse/elliptic.inverse.field.html.
This is how I had defined, seeing the example given.
layer_size = [3, [30,30], [30,30], [30,30], [30,30], [30,30], 2] activation = "tanh" initializer = "Glorot uniform" net = dde.nn.PFNN(layer_size, activation, initializer).I am having doubt on what do I need to change to implement according to my condition. I am confused.
I am eager to hear your response. Thankyou in Advance
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions