Physics informed neural operators #927
mattragoza
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Yes, sounds good. I think you can start with the implementation of pure data driven loss, and then implement the physics loss. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am interested in using deepxde framework for operator learning constrained by a physical PDE. However I would like to use neural operators rather than DeepONet as I need to be able to generalize to input functions with different geometries (the "sensor points" are not consistent).
I think I need a new data format that supports quadruple data instances (x, a, y, u) which represent samples of the input function a(x) and output function u(y), and where y can be a different set of points than x. However I want to train the model using physics informed loss, like data.PDE or data.PDEOperator. So I can't just use data.Quadruple.
I would like to contribute features that would make this possible. Any suggestions on how to approach this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions