Replies: 1 comment
-
|
All sound good. But I think the easiest way is what was done in NSFnet, i.e., after training, do a post-processing to shift the pressure. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all, In the Beltrami flow code, the pressure is defined up to a constant.
In order to compare the predicted and exact pressions, I was trying to find a way to realize a proper shifting.
In NSFnets (Navier-Stokes Flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for
the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, p.11, the authors: "apply a shift for the NSFnet simulation results to bring the means of the pressure for reference DNS results and NSFnet results to the same value."
In FEM simulations, e.g. for Neumann BCs, one often adds a term to the variational formulation (ref: Steinbach).
A few ideas:
D \times [0,T]and remove it, to obtain an exact solution with zero average ("centered").Do you know how to proceed?
Best,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions