Custom "attribute_set_id" filter applied by the collection processors override condition type in search criteria

[Serializator]

Preconditions (*)

1. Magento 2.4 / 2.3.5-p2 / 2.4-develop

Steps to reproduce (*)

1. Create one or more attribute sets
2. Create one or more attribute groups in these attribute sets
3. Try to retrieve these attribute groups from both attribute sets using the REST endpoint below

/rest/V1/products/attribute-sets/{attribute-set-id}/groups/list?searchCriteria[filter_groups][0][filters][0][field]=attribute_set_id&searchCriteria[filter_groups][0][filters][0][value]={attribute_set_ids_comma_separated}&searchCriteria[filter_groups][0][filters][0][condition_type]=in

Expected result (*)

1. Attribute groups from the given attribute sets in the search criteria

Actual result (*)

1. No results or only the results from the attribute set of which the id is the first id in the comma separated list of ids ("14,25,30,60" would only return the attribute groups from the attribute set with id 14, for example)

Additional

Magento\Eav\Model\Api\SearchCriteria\CollectionProcessor\FilterProcessor\AttributeGroupAttributeSetIdFilter does not take into account any of the other condition types supported by the search criteria as described in the Magento API documentation.

https://devdocs.magento.com/guides/v2.4/rest/performing-searches.html

It overrides any given condition type with eq.

---

Please provide Severity assessment for the Issue as Reporter. This information will help during Confirmation and Issue triage processes.

• Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
• Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.

Additional info from Engcom

Attribute set id from eav_attribute_group table

GET catalogProductAttributeGroupRepositoryV1

The response body contains only 1, despite that three values are entered comma separated

[m2-assistant]

Hi @Serializator. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

• Summary of the issue
• Information on your environment
• Steps to reproduce
• Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance - upcoming 2.4.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

Please, add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this

---

• Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.

⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed after 14 days if no further activity occurs. Is this issue still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward? Thank you for your contributions!

[Serializator]

@magento-engcom-team, I do not believe this issue should be closed because it is "stale", as such a comment so that it won't be closed. I think all information necessary is in the description of the issue. Please let me know if you need any more information!

[m2-assistant]

Hi @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

• 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

  Details

  If the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

• 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

• 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

• 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

  Details

  - Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
  - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
  - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

• 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

• 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

[engcom-Bravo]

Hello @Serializator

Thank you for your report.

We Confirm that the issue is reproducible on the latest 2.4-develop. Additional info is added to the Description.