Completely removing a gallery-image from be keeps scope roles/types set (base/small/thumbnail) and after re-adding "old" roles/types appear

[romeof1980]

Preconditions and environment

PRECONDITIONS:

• magento version: 2.4.7
• magento installation with at least 2 store views

Steps to reproduce

• add a simple product
• add an image in the default scope and select "base" type/role
• make sure the type/role has been inherited by the store-scopes
• remove or change types/roles in a store_view scope (i.e. remove the "base" type/role)
• completely remove the gallery image (from scopes and from default)
• re-add a new image in the default scope and flag the type/role "base"

Expected result

• in the store scopes the images inherit the roles/types of the new added image as per the default scope

Actual result

• if we previously removed the "base" type/role in a specific store-view, even if the image was completely removed from the gallery, after re-adding the image now in the specific store-scope the type/roles are the ones of the old (removed) image instead the ones of the default image (we expected inheritance)

Additional information

No response

Release note

No response

Triage and priority

• Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
• Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.

[m2-assistant]

Hi @romeof1980. Thank you for your report.
To speed up processing of this issue, make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce.

• For more details, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
• Add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this
• To learn more about issue processing workflow, refer to the Code Contributions.

---

Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.
⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.
🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

[romeof1980]

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance

[m2-assistant]

Hi @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

• 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).
• 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue.
• 3. Add Area: XXXXX label to the ticket, indicating the functional areas it may be related to.
• 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch
  Details

  - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
  - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
• 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
• 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

[romeof1980]

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance

[engcom-Bravo]

Hi @romeof1980,

Thanks for reporting and collaboration.

We have verified the issue in Latest 2.4-develop instance and the issue is reproducible.Kindly refer the screenshots.

Even though image was completely removed after re-adding the image now in the specific store-scope the type/roles are the ones of the old (removed).

Hence Confirming the issue.

Thanks.