[IDEA] Building Efficiency Rating - Building specific additional score

[Arklur]

In some cases, I would want to keep buildings even though they have a low score.

1. It might be because they produce something special (like frags for ascended upgrades, see the Hippo in my case)
2. Don't want to increase a specific resource usefulness because I only need a specific amount of it and no more, therefore it makes no sense to "overshot" the score of it (a good example would be "Mass Self Aid Kit", though it's part of the 1st one)
3. GBs are always bright red for months, but I don't want to remove them.

Just a visual aid for the Hippo and the GBs, there isn't much to see otherwise:

What I had in mind is what if I could add buildings to a list (the add could be similar to how the "Add Building" works for the main window) and set a specific score for the building which would be an extra on top of the existing score. Hippo has a score of 1100 in my case and I would like to bring it to let's say 2000, so I add a raw 900 to its value. This extra value could be a new column when looking at the buildings and how they get their scores, though visually it might be much more challenging (/tile value?...).

[panda667]

I like this too! The amount of WWs and LWWs I have (7 total, not too bad for a relatively young city) skews the Worst Rated building amount and it distracts me from counting my actual worst-rated buildings.

Also it's pretty funny that WWs are classified as "Worst Rated" in the first place bc everyone says that WWs are essential for diamond farming and extra coins/supplies most of the rest of the time.

[outoftheline]

hmm i dont think its necessary.
when there is only a handful of buildings that you want to keep around, you can memorize it yourself imo

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.