| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Build registration | pass |
| Source set size | pass (module core files present) |
| Focused test presence | pass |
| Open hardening findings | yes |
| Critical blockers | none identified |
- src/replication/replication_manager.cpp
- src/replication/raft_v2.cpp
- src/replication/logical_replication.cpp
- src/replication/multi_tier_replication.cpp
- src/replication/conflict_resolution.cpp
- src/replication/event_stream.cpp
- src/replication/replication_slot.cpp
- src/replication/schema_cdc.cpp
- src/replication/observability.cpp
- src/replication/policy.cpp
- [REPL-AUD-01] failover/promotion edge hardening remains active under lag and contention.
- Severity: medium
- Evidence: roadmap/future retain active hardening for promotion and lag-heavy scenarios.
- Action: extend deterministic stress and failure-path regression coverage.
- [REPL-AUD-02] conflict/slot diagnostics need deeper consistency.
- Severity: medium
- Evidence: active follow-up work for conflict and stream/slot incident taxonomy.
- Action: unify diagnostics across resolver, slot, and CDC path failures.
- [REPL-AUD-03] benchmark depth should grow for advanced distributed topologies.
- Severity: low
- Evidence: current mapping is valid while advanced multi-tier/multi-writer coverage remains limited.
- Action: add benchmark depth for advanced topology and contention scenarios.
- core replication runtime surfaces are present and source-verified.
- documentation set is synchronized to source-verifiable claims.
- changelog/roadmap role separation is aligned to module governance pattern.
| Requirement | Status |
|---|---|
| Source-verifiable behavior claims | pass |
| Structured forward planning in roadmap/future | pass |
| Historical completion tracked in changelog | pass |
| Core module docs synchronized | pass |