You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: classification-systems/nzlum/README.md
+20-22Lines changed: 20 additions & 22 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ An overview of the class hierarchy is provided below, with further details of th
85
85
86
86
1.**Biodiversity protection**
87
87
88
-
Nature conservation classes are based on the suggested classification scheme for the Protected Areas Network of New Zealand (PAN-NZ) in relation to biodiversity protection, following Bellingham 2016 and Planzer et al. 2024. Specifically, Tertiary classes 1.1.1–1.1.3 are based on the classification for areas legally protected for biodiversity (see Appendix A for more details).
88
+
Nature conservation classes are based on the suggested classification scheme for the Protected Areas Network of New Zealand (PAN-NZ) in relation to biodiversity protection, following Bellingham 2016[^7] and Planzer et al. 2024[^8]. Specifically, Tertiary classes 1.1.1–1.1.3 are based on the classification for areas legally protected for biodiversity (see Appendix A for more details).
89
89
90
90
1.**High degree of biodiversity protection**
91
91
(Bellingham Rank 5) – protection is the main purpose or is ranked equally with a limited number of other compatible purposes (e.g. national parks, nature reserves).
@@ -439,22 +439,6 @@ This section specifies the proposed data structure for the attribution of land-u
439
439
| source_date | date |`2023-12-01`| Date of spatial featue (e.g. image date, ancillary photo date) in primary source data |
440
440
| source_scale | string |`1:25000`| Geographical scale of primary source data, expressed as an implied ratio of 1:n, (e.g. 1:25,000). For raster data, the value should be the larger of cell height or width. |
441
441
442
-
## References
443
-
444
-
[^1]: Cavanagh J, Whitehead B 2022. Land-use classification for state of the environment soil quality monitoring and reporting. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research contract report LC4146. https://www.envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/2222-GSDC170- Land-use-classification-for-state-of-the-environment-soil-quality-monitoring-and- reporting.pdf
445
-
446
-
[^2]: Cavanagh J, Whitehead B 2023. Enabling flexibility and connectivity in land-use classification for state of the environment soil quality monitoring. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research contract report LC4309 for Land Monitoring Forum. https://www.envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/R18-4-Enabling-flexibility-and- connectivity-in-land-use-classification-for-state-of-the-environment-soil-quality- monitoring.pdf
447
-
448
-
[^3]: Rutledge D, Cameron M, Briggs C, Elliott S, Fenton T, Hurkens J, et al. 2016. WISE: Waikato Integrated Scenario Explorer. Technical Report #3506882. Waikato Regional Council
449
-
450
-
[^4]: Price R, Rutledge D, Fraser M 2010. New Zealand Land Use Database. Envirolink Project LCRX0901 Draft Database Design Report
451
-
452
-
[^5]: MfE (Ministry for the Environment) 2019. National planning standards. https://environment.govt.nz/publications/national-planning-standards/
453
-
454
-
[^6]: LINZ (Land Information New Zealand) 2010. Rating valuations rules 2008: version date 1 October 2010 – LINZS30300. https://www.linz.govt.nz/resources/regulatory/rating- valuations-rules-2008-version-date-1-october-2010-linzs30300
455
-
456
-
---
457
-
458
442
## Tenure
459
443
460
444
Information relating to land tenure should be captured in two attributes: `land_estate` and `land_status`. How land is owned, and by whom, is an important consideration for how land may be used or managed. This information is included because it directly participates in the intended use of the land use classification system, though it is auxiliary.
@@ -524,15 +508,15 @@ _To be determined_: a controlled vocabulary to describe these by reference to so
524
508
1. Iwi
525
509
526
510
527
-
###Geographic scale
511
+
## Geographic scale
528
512
529
513
The intended geographic unit of this classification system is the property parcel. However it may be appropriate to map sub-parcel geographic entities for particular classes, particularly if the boundary of natural features (forests, waterways) is pertinent, if the parcel is very large, and where source data scale permits such definition. Whether to map sub-parcel areas is therefore left to operator discretion, but the intended and minimum level of attribution is the property parcel, and therefore property parcel identifiers and geogaphic boundaries must be present in output land use data.
530
514
531
-
###Temporality
515
+
## Temporality
532
516
533
517
Interannual. A crop planted for a whole year is a commodity, but not neccessarily a land use e.g. if it's part of livestock farm system. The primary economic purpose over an interannual period is the determining factor for the assignment of a land-use class.
534
518
535
-
###Data format and spatial referencing
519
+
## Data format and spatial referencing
536
520
537
521
Vector data format: [GeoPackage](https://www.geopackage.org/) v1.4.0 or later and/or [GeoParquet](https://geoparquet.org/) v1.0.0 or later.
538
522
@@ -544,6 +528,20 @@ Coordinate system: any [current official projection](https://www.linz.govt.nz/gu
544
528
- NZGD meridional circuits (e.g. for regional extracts) or offshore island projections.
545
529
- New Zealand Continental Shelf Lambert Conformal 2000 (NZCS2000).
546
530
547
-
# References
531
+
## References
532
+
533
+
[^1]: Cavanagh J, Whitehead B 2022. Land-use classification for state of the environment soil quality monitoring and reporting. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research contract report LC4146. https://www.envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/2222-GSDC170- Land-use-classification-for-state-of-the-environment-soil-quality-monitoring-and- reporting.pdf
534
+
535
+
[^2]: Cavanagh J, Whitehead B 2023. Enabling flexibility and connectivity in land-use classification for state of the environment soil quality monitoring. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research contract report LC4309 for Land Monitoring Forum. https://www.envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/R18-4-Enabling-flexibility-and- connectivity-in-land-use-classification-for-state-of-the-environment-soil-quality- monitoring.pdf
536
+
537
+
[^3]: Rutledge D, Cameron M, Briggs C, Elliott S, Fenton T, Hurkens J, et al. 2016. WISE: Waikato Integrated Scenario Explorer. Technical Report #3506882. Waikato Regional Council
538
+
539
+
[^4]: Price R, Rutledge D, Fraser M 2010. New Zealand Land Use Database. Envirolink Project LCRX0901 Draft Database Design Report
540
+
541
+
[^5]: MfE (Ministry for the Environment) 2019. National planning standards. https://environment.govt.nz/publications/national-planning-standards/
542
+
543
+
[^6]: LINZ (Land Information New Zealand) 2010. Rating valuations rules 2008: version date 1 October 2010 – LINZS30300. https://www.linz.govt.nz/resources/regulatory/rating- valuations-rules-2008-version-date-1-october-2010-linzs30300
544
+
545
+
[^7]: Bellingham PJ, Overton JMcC, Thomson FJ, MacLeod CJ, Holdaway RJ, Wiser SK, Brown M, Gormley AM, Collins D, Latham DM, Bishop C, Rutledge DT, Innes JG, Warburton B 2016 Standardised terrestrial biodiversity indicators for use by regional councils. Landcare Research Contract Report LC2109 prepared for Regional Councils' Biodiversity Monitoring Working Group, Auckland Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
548
546
549
-
Bellingham PJ, Overton JMcC, Thomson FJ, MacLeod CJ, Holdaway RJ, Wiser SK, Brown M, Gormley AM, Collins D, Latham DM, Bishop C, Rutledge DT, Innes JG, Warburton B 2016 Standardised terrestrial biodiversity indicators for use by regional councils. Landcare Research Contract Report LC2109 prepared for Regional Councils' Biodiversity Monitoring Working Group, Auckland Council, Auckland, New Zealand.
547
+
[^8]: Planzer S, Bellis S, Gatiso T 2024. Protected Areas Network New Zealand methodology review and report. Phase II – stakeholder engagement. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research contract report LC4446.
0 commit comments