[Feedback]: Account Type Capability Ambiguous

[parseb]

Page

https://docs.zksync.io/build/developer-reference/account-abstraction

Description

The text mentions EOAs, Contract accounts and then jumps to smart accounts. It does not seem clear for me if I can sponsor transactions for EOAs as most projects rely on existing ownership relations (msg.sender).

The major question being, can I sponsor a transaction for an EOA while keeping msg.sender the EOA?
Feedback might be rushed, did not ponder, but first read, it was not clear for me.

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[Romsters]

@parseb yes, you can use paymaster. Paymaster can sponsor any transaction, transaction sender remains unchanged.