Skip to content

Commit 6a016b9

Browse files
authored
[Security Solution] [AI assistant] Fix bug with running default assistant graph evals (elastic#237996)
## Summary Summarize your PR. If it involves visual changes include a screenshot or gif. Fix bug where Security Assistant graph evals could not be run because there was a missing thread ID. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well. - [X] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/platform/packages/shared/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [X] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials - [X] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios - [X] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker) - [X] This was checked for breaking HTTP API changes, and any breaking changes have been approved by the breaking-change committee. The `release_note:breaking` label should be applied in these situations. - [X] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed - [X] The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section, and the correct `release_note:*` label is applied per the [guidelines](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) - [X] Review the [backport guidelines](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VyN5k91e5OVumlc0Gb9RPa3h1ewuPE705nRtioPiTvY/edit?usp=sharing) and apply applicable `backport:*` labels. ### Identify risks Does this PR introduce any risks? For example, consider risks like hard to test bugs, performance regression, potential of data loss. Describe the risk, its severity, and mitigation for each identified risk. Invite stakeholders and evaluate how to proceed before merging. - [ ] [See some risk examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) - [ ] ...
1 parent 0e8ff28 commit 6a016b9

1 file changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

  • x-pack/solutions/security/plugins/elastic_assistant/server/routes/evaluate

x-pack/solutions/security/plugins/elastic_assistant/server/routes/evaluate/post_evaluate.ts

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -507,6 +507,9 @@ export const postEvaluateRoute = (
507507
{
508508
runName,
509509
tags: ['evaluation'],
510+
configurable: {
511+
thread_id: uuidv4(),
512+
},
510513
}
511514
);
512515
const lastMessage = result.messages[result.messages.length - 1];

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)