-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Issues: mc-imperial/spirv-control-flow
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
The continue target is a header block whose merge lies outside the continue construct
modelling
#33
opened Oct 13, 2021 by
vili-1
Pushing a set of samples at https://github.com/dneto0/spirv-samples through our tooling
modelling
#38
opened Sep 21, 2021 by
vili-1
Discrepancy between model/spec and validator regarding OpSwitch targets
modelling
#39
opened Aug 5, 2021 by
afd
OpSwitch: Target must be alternating scalar integer literals
modelling
#42
opened Jul 28, 2021 by
vili-1
Check that our Alloy model accepts control flow graphs from the Vulkan CTS
modelling
#48
opened Jun 8, 2021 by
afd
Consider introducing "structured-dominance" to simplify control flow rules
modelling
#47
opened May 27, 2021 by
afd
The SPIR-V specification does not define the term "outer" for constructs
modelling
#46
opened May 27, 2021 by
afd
ProTip!
Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.