Release v1.0.0 contains no empirical evidence dataset. The manuscript
workspace now contains draft source-reported extractions in this directory.
Their presence must not be interpreted as an eligible synthesis corpus: every
current record has record_status: draft, verification_status: unverified,
and synthesis_eligibility.status: pending.
A candidate record must follow the contribution policy
and recording guide. In particular, it must identify one source, one
system configuration, and one task or protocol; provide exact source locators;
disclose missing resources and comparator asymmetries; and begin with synthesis
eligibility set to pending unless a declared review protocol establishes a
different status. Verification checks must identify their reviewer, date,
scope, and notes; eligibility requires checks by at least two distinct
reviewers.
Two named manuscript authors must verify every source locator, configuration, denominator, resource condition, comparator, and permitted interpretation before changing those lifecycle fields.
Future populated releases should add a machine-readable manifest containing the record ID, file path, source identifier, evidence class, editorial status, synthesis status, schema version, and file checksum for every record.
Before empirical records are released, the repository will declare whether they use the software license or a separate data license.