|
| 1 | +package main |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import ( |
| 4 | + "context" |
| 5 | + "sync" |
| 6 | + "testing" |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" |
| 9 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
| 10 | +) |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +func TestLocalLockManager_AcquireAndRelease(t *testing.T) { |
| 13 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 14 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | + acquired, release, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 17 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 18 | + assert.True(t, acquired) |
| 19 | + assert.NotNil(t, release) |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + release() |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + // After release, can acquire again |
| 24 | + acquired, release, err = m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 25 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 26 | + assert.True(t, acquired) |
| 27 | + assert.NotNil(t, release) |
| 28 | + release() |
| 29 | +} |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +func TestLocalLockManager_DoubleAcquireReturnsFalse(t *testing.T) { |
| 32 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 33 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + acquired1, release1, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 36 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 37 | + assert.True(t, acquired1) |
| 38 | + defer release1() |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + // Second acquire on same key should fail |
| 41 | + acquired2, release2, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 42 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 43 | + assert.False(t, acquired2) |
| 44 | + assert.Nil(t, release2) |
| 45 | +} |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +func TestLocalLockManager_ReleaseOfUnheldLockIsIdempotent(t *testing.T) { |
| 48 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 49 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + acquired, release, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 52 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 53 | + assert.True(t, acquired) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | + // Call release twice - should not panic |
| 56 | + release() |
| 57 | + release() |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + // Lock should be acquirable again |
| 60 | + acquired2, release2, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 61 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 62 | + assert.True(t, acquired2) |
| 63 | + release2() |
| 64 | +} |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +func TestLocalLockManager_DifferentKeysAreIndependent(t *testing.T) { |
| 67 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 68 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + acquired1, release1, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 71 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 72 | + assert.True(t, acquired1) |
| 73 | + defer release1() |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | + // Different resource on same tenant can be acquired |
| 76 | + acquired2, release2, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-b") |
| 77 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 78 | + assert.True(t, acquired2) |
| 79 | + defer release2() |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | + // Different tenant, same resource can be acquired |
| 82 | + acquired3, release3, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-2", "resource-a") |
| 83 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 84 | + assert.True(t, acquired3) |
| 85 | + defer release3() |
| 86 | +} |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +func TestLocalLockManager_StaleReleaseDoesNotUnlockNewHolder(t *testing.T) { |
| 89 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 90 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + // First acquisition |
| 93 | + acquired1, release1, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 94 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 95 | + assert.True(t, acquired1) |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + // Release - lock is now free |
| 98 | + release1() |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + // Second acquisition of same key |
| 101 | + acquired2, release2, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 102 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 103 | + assert.True(t, acquired2) |
| 104 | + defer release2() |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | + // Stale release1 called again - must NOT release the new holder's lock |
| 107 | + release1() |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + // Lock should still be held: a third acquire must fail |
| 110 | + acquired3, release3, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 111 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 112 | + assert.False(t, acquired3, "stale release should not have freed the lock held by the second acquirer") |
| 113 | + assert.Nil(t, release3) |
| 114 | +} |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +func TestLocalLockManager_ColonInResourceIDNoCollision(t *testing.T) { |
| 117 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 118 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + // These two pairs would produce the same string with a ":" delimiter: |
| 121 | + // "tenant" + ":" + "a:b" == "tenant:a" + ":" + "b" |
| 122 | + // The struct key prevents this collision. |
| 123 | + acquired1, release1, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant", "a:b") |
| 124 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 125 | + assert.True(t, acquired1) |
| 126 | + defer release1() |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + acquired2, release2, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant:a", "b") |
| 129 | + require.NoError(t, err) |
| 130 | + assert.True(t, acquired2, "keys with ':' in resourceID must not collide with different tenantID") |
| 131 | + defer release2() |
| 132 | +} |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +func TestAlwaysLeader_IsLeaderReturnsTrue(t *testing.T) { |
| 135 | + ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background()) |
| 136 | + defer cancel() |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | + l := &alwaysLeader{} |
| 139 | + l.Start(ctx) |
| 140 | + assert.True(t, l.IsLeader()) |
| 141 | + l.Stop() |
| 142 | + assert.True(t, l.IsLeader()) |
| 143 | +} |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +func TestLocalLockManager_Concurrency(t *testing.T) { |
| 146 | + m := newLocalLockManager() |
| 147 | + ctx := context.Background() |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | + const goroutines = 50 |
| 150 | + acquisitions := make([]bool, goroutines) |
| 151 | + var wg sync.WaitGroup |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + for i := range goroutines { |
| 154 | + wg.Add(1) |
| 155 | + go func(idx int) { |
| 156 | + defer wg.Done() |
| 157 | + acquired, release, err := m.Acquire(ctx, "tenant-1", "resource-a") |
| 158 | + if err == nil && acquired { |
| 159 | + acquisitions[idx] = true |
| 160 | + release() |
| 161 | + } |
| 162 | + }(i) |
| 163 | + } |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | + wg.Wait() |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | + // At least one goroutine should have acquired the lock |
| 168 | + var count int |
| 169 | + for _, a := range acquisitions { |
| 170 | + if a { |
| 171 | + count++ |
| 172 | + } |
| 173 | + } |
| 174 | + assert.Greater(t, count, 0) |
| 175 | +} |
0 commit comments