[Feature Request]: Rename infrastructure roles to limit misuse

[PvPDM]

Platform

Cross-Platform

Description

I believe that both router and repeater roles should be renamed to indicate to new and not experienced users that they are network-wide infrastructure and should not be used .

The current way of trying to stop inexperienced users from misusing router and repeater roles (a popup saying "Are you sure" with two links to documentation and a "I know what I am doing" checkbox) doesn't seem to stop newcomers from setting their rooftop nodes to it. Some points from the docs and the blog should also be added to that popup, maybe even a small infographic.

client_base is a perfect example of a role name that describes it's use due to the use of "base". To that extent, my opinion is that the other two infrastructure roles should be renamed to include a term such as "infrastructure","wide-area","strategic","tower",etc in the name.

I know that the community won't really like a short name like repeater being renamed to strategic_wide-area_infrastructure_no-repeat_pleasedonotuseforyourrooftopnodes, so a lot of thought should be put into this.

Also, this could only apply to the mobile apps where inexperienced users are more likely to mess up and cause a problem. Though, this could cause many more problems down the road with the same role having 2 names.

[github-actions[bot]]

@PvPDM, Welcome to Meshtastic! 👋

Thanks for opening your first issue. If it's helpful, an easy way
to get logs is the "Open Serial Monitor" button on the Web Flasher.

If you have ideas for features, note that we often debate big ideas
in the discussions tab
first. This tracker tends to be for ideas that have community
consensus and a clear implementation.

We're very active on discord,
especially the #firmware and #alphanauts-testing channels. If you'll
be around for a while, we'd love to see you there!

Welcome to the community! ❤️

[b8b8]

Repeater role has been deprecated already.

The rest of this is a duplicate.

#7456

#6663