feat: add additional auth provider that uses oauth token introspection #2187
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
grs
requested review from
ashwinb,
ehhuang,
hardikjshah,
leseb,
raghotham,
terrytangyuan and
yanxi0830
as code owners
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Contributor
Author
|
@ashwinb I have updated this to add an alternative behaviour to your oauth_token provider, rather than having a distinct provider. |
ashwinb
reviewed
May 19, 2025
leseb
reviewed
May 20, 2025
ashwinb
reviewed
May 20, 2025
ashwinb
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
Contributor
ashwinb
left a comment
ashwinb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
woot. I have one comment inline about validation but looks good otherwise.
grs
force-pushed
the
rfc7662
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5c25a19 to
c31fc60
Compare
This may be desired in order to reject revoked tokens or where opaque tokens are used. Signed-off-by: Gordon Sim <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This adds an alternative option to the oauth_token auth provider that can be used with existing authorization services which support token introspection as defined in RFC 7662. This could be useful where token revocation needs to be handled or where opaque tokens (or other non jwt formatted tokens) are used
Test Plan
Tested against keycloak