Skip to content

Alpha_I_Pixel concerns #1

@joaco18

Description

@joaco18

Hi! Thanks for your implementation of this paper it has been very helpful and I've learnt some cool efficiency tricks from it.

I have a doubt about the vectorized function Alpha_I_Pixel:

@jit(nopython=True)
def Alpha_I_Pixel(item,minVal, maxVal):
    return (item * minVal) / (maxVal - minVal)

I don't see in the paper where this operation is applied, in equation 15 it applies an operation equal to T_or_I_of_Neutrsophic function not Alpha_I_Pixel. Am I missing something?

Also (this is not an issue but a curious doubt), I've notice you do the mean filtering in a separate fashion. I can see that the mean filter is a separable one, so the two step convolution should be the same as doing it in only one step with the square filter. I was intrigued and checked the computation time, in deed doing it separately takes almost half the time, but I checked the results and they are not equal. I simply did the difference between the results from doing it in two steps or in one with the square filter and surprisingly I found that not all the results were the same, yours seems to return higher values. Maybe you've checked this and have some thoughts to share!

Thank you in advance!
Joaquín

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions