See linked-in discussion.
In favor of light grey design or against dark design:
- I actually wish you could have the graphic from A in dark mode, as I think they "illustrate" the concept better.
- A’s artwork is “better” as B’s feel like more related to electronic circuits designs.
If the book is more academic then A color scheme is better but if it’s more pragmatic, then B’s colors would be my choice.
- The art in B is very generic any reminds me of every AI book on the shelves, even at the actual physical MIT press bookstore
- Brain-like circuit boards have been overused IMHO :)
- Representation of networks is better in option A imho
- If you change font color in A, I think A wins
- B is easier to read, A has better artwork
- Option A is a bit closer to reflect the topic
- B's image does feel like circuitry
- I find the B option to scifi and A to be the more down to earth one
- Light one as title says more about predictions, which is farthest and distant… shadowy light looks better expression… it should be surreal …Dark one looks more Technical
- it's not just light vs dark - it is "let be the light.. in greys" - a non-trivial grey tonalities where the artist captured the range beautifully vs trivial black and electric (?!) blue. The light greys are beautiful and inspiring if you like =). I would have made everything in greys only
- the main dominating factor here is the fine picture - there is more to it than a restricted in-angles chip-like boring of the dark.
It's a clever thing to combine sine curves ( ~ Fourier transform) interconnected in graphs and a networked sphere juxtaposed with the levels - well done to the artis
-Option B with the Design from Option A
-Option A, since option B looks too generic
- A, B looks cookie cutter.
In favor of dark design, or arguments against light grey
- It immediately tells it is a tech related book and dark theme hints at dark future and AI risks.
Also, I think more likely to be picked by tech audience from the shelves.
- I like B but if you end up keeping the book on the beach with all the free time you'll have after automating your trades, the cover will bleach in the sun
- Dark: It drew my eyes to it.
- Right one looks more interesting / eye catching to me - left looks too bland for me :)
- Option B. It seems more fluid and open
- Dark all day long sir
- B would be my choice. No technical reason. Just subjective esthetics.
- Option B is a better thumbnail
- Option B with vibrant colors
- Option B. The graphic looks like an aerial view of the grid from Tron Legacy which is a neat segue into AI futurism.
- B looks better.
- Option B reason is analogous to why dark themed IDEs >> light themed IDEs… Easier on the eyes.
- The higher image contrast of B is much better for grabbing attention
- Right side, darker cover, better contrast, more aesthetically pleasing
- Dark mode for aesthetic reasons, but I actually wish you could have the graphic from A in dark mode, as I think they "illustrate" the concept better.
- It's more intuitive with the prediction signals for AI. So, I will vote for B design.
- B is easier to read, A has better artwork.
- Definitely option B, more focused on the text than background. Although like for art of the option A better
- B, more contrast less tiring on eyes
See linked-in discussion.
In favor of light grey design or against dark design:
If the book is more academic then A color scheme is better but if it’s more pragmatic, then B’s colors would be my choice.
It's a clever thing to combine sine curves ( ~ Fourier transform) interconnected in graphs and a networked sphere juxtaposed with the levels - well done to the artis
-Option B with the Design from Option A
-Option A, since option B looks too generic
In favor of dark design, or arguments against light grey
Also, I think more likely to be picked by tech audience from the shelves.