Create CheckBoxWithDescription in XAML

[Jay-o-Way]

Check out this branch: github.com/Jay-o-Way/PowerToys/tree/CheckBoxWithDescription (w.i.p.)
@niels9001 Seems to work fine, but there are quite some errors in the Error List...

Just have to look into if it's better to create a user control or a template control.

Concept

	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<UserControl
	  x:Class="Microsoft.PowerToys.Settings.UI.Controls.CheckBoxWithDescription"
	  xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
	  xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
	  xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
	    xmlns:local="using:Microsoft.PowerToys.Settings.UI.Controls"
	  xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
	    mc:Ignorable="d">

	  <Grid>
		<CheckBox>
		    <CheckBox.Content>
			<StackPanel>
			    <TextBlock Text="{x:Bind Header, FallbackValue=''}" TextWrapping="WrapWholeWords" />
			    <TextBlock Style="{ThemeResource CaptionTextBlockStyle}" Text="{x:Bind Description, FallbackValue=''}" />
			</StackPanel>
		    </CheckBox.Content>
		</CheckBox>
	  </Grid>
</UserControl>

[htcfreek]

@Jay-o-Way
What do you mean with the issue title?

[Jay-o-Way]

The control is only created with CS, would be better to use XAML

[niels9001]

@Jay-o-Way I know there was something about center alignment..

Recreating this in XAML requires a lot of XAML style duplication (that we'd need to manually keep in sync with the WinUI repo) which can be a pain whenever e.g. a11y fixes are pushed there. That might be something to keep in mind and determine if it's worth it.

[Jay-o-Way]

No we don't. We can simply create a control, based on CheckBox, and then set new Content. Easy peasy.

[niels9001]

No we don't. We can simply create a control, based on CheckBox, and then set new Content. Easy peasy.

Hmm I believe it should enherit from CheckBox and not Control, so we still have all a11y/narrator features. Not sure though, we might run into a few issues.

EDIT: Oh I see you are doing that but you are using a UserControl vs a templated control. You could try to enherit from UC then. But this only adds an additional wrapper though 🤔.

Looking at what we currently have, what was the issue again with the current implementation?