Replies: 1 comment
-
|
AFAICT this registry doesn't want alternatives which can't be installed simultaneously (file name clashes, symbols clashes). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm considering adding either jpegli within libjxl or Google's fork of jpegli to the vcpkg port.
However, installing jpegli results in file conflicts with installed as libjpeg-turbo.
https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/lib/jpegli.cmake#L134-L149
For example, modifying the libjxl port to implement jpegli support results in the following error:
Should we avoid adding new ports to install these headers, as seen with the removal of ijg-jpeg and mozjpeg in #42222?
Or is there some workaround available?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions