Packages such as wire-desktop-bin have some messed up .SRCINFOs. Now obviously the .SRCINFOs should be fixed to be indented nicely but I do believe the srcinfo format is not white space dependant. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/.SRCINFO Does say "Lines may be indented." which leads me to think it's optional.
Instead the pkgname = field should be treated as the start of a new package, no matter the indention.
This should allow gopkgbuild to be more robust and not fail to parse those weird .SRCINFOs that are different but technically correct.
Packages such as wire-desktop-bin have some messed up .SRCINFOs. Now obviously the .SRCINFOs should be fixed to be indented nicely but I do believe the srcinfo format is not white space dependant. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/.SRCINFO Does say "Lines may be indented." which leads me to think it's optional.
Instead the
pkgname =field should be treated as the start of a new package, no matter the indention.This should allow gopkgbuild to be more robust and not fail to parse those weird .SRCINFOs that are different but technically correct.