|
| 1 | +# Phase 3E Closure Report v0.2.5 |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Phase 3E is the controlled transition and intervention-aware validation layer. This report assesses whether its deliverables are complete and whether the phase can graduate. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Phase Mission (from charter) |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Validate the relationship between events, observations, interventions, workflow conditions and topology transitions under controlled or intervention-aware conditions, without entering Phase 4 theory finalization. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Corpus Snapshot at Closure |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +| Metric | Value | |
| 12 | +|--------|-------| |
| 13 | +| Data sessions | 1,517 | |
| 14 | +| Metadata sessions | 992 | |
| 15 | +| Events | 131,952 | |
| 16 | +| Runtime breadth | 7 | |
| 17 | +| Task breadth | 9 | |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +**Lane distribution**: |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +| Lane | Sessions | Events | |
| 22 | +|------|----------|--------| |
| 23 | +| `direct_prompt_native` | 101 | 32,141 | |
| 24 | +| `superpowers_workflow_intervention` | 8 | 42,465 | |
| 25 | +| `controlled_prompt_morphology` | 3 | 135 | |
| 26 | +| `routed_prompt_intervention` | 0 | 0 | |
| 27 | +| unlabeled | 880 | 16,160 | |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +## Deliverable 1: Lane Baseline (3E-1) — COMPLETE |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Four lanes characterized with per-lane session counts, event counts, runtime distributions, and task type distributions. Baseline frozen at `lane_baseline_v0.2.5.md`. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Key finding: native lane (101 sessions) is the only lane with statistical mass. Intervention lanes are infrastructure-ready but corpus-sparse. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +## Deliverable 2: Intervention Lane Annotation (3E-2) — COMPLETE |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +Annotation pass reviewed 18 Skill-tool candidate sessions. Results: |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +| Evidence Level | Count | Action | |
| 40 | +|----------------|-------|--------| |
| 41 | +| Strong (Skill+PlanMode+Workflow) | 1 | Annotated as superpowers | |
| 42 | +| Moderate (Skill+PlanMode) | 2 | Annotated as superpowers | |
| 43 | +| Weak (Skill only) | 15 | Deferred (insufficient evidence) | |
| 44 | +| Routed | 0 | Honestly reported | |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +Annotation criteria, evidence levels, and non-inference rule documented in `intervention_lane_annotation_plan_v0.2.5.md` and `intervention_lane_candidates_v0.2.5.md`. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +## Deliverable 3: Capture Instrumentation (3E-3) — COMPLETE |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +- `SOURCES` expanded to accept `routed_prompt_intervention`, `superpowers_workflow_intervention`, `controlled_prompt_morphology` |
| 51 | +- `INTERVENTION_LANES` constant defined |
| 52 | +- `SessionMetadata` expanded with `intervention_lane`, `causetrace_tags`, `intervention_evidence_source`, `intervention_evidence_level` |
| 53 | +- Capture tag format specs defined for prompt-routing-skill, superpowers, and controlled prompt morphology |
| 54 | +- Upstream tools updated (prompt-routing-skill SKILL.md, superpowers using-superpowers SKILL.md) |
| 55 | +- `causetrace metadata-set --intervention-lane`, `annotate --tag`, `corpus --lane` CLI tooling built |
| 56 | +- `corpus lane-count` and `corpus gate-status` subcommands operational |
| 57 | +- `detect-tags` command for scanning session JSONL for causetrace_tags YAML blocks |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## Deliverable 4: Parser Detection Gate — COMPLETE |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Activation gate system implemented: parser detection for an intervention lane requires >=5 explicitly tagged sessions before activation. Rationale: premature detection on 1-2 samples risks encoding heuristic patterns that mislabel future sessions. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +| Lane | Tagged | Required | Gate | |
| 64 | +|------|--------|----------|------| |
| 65 | +| `superpowers_workflow_intervention` | 5 | 5 | **OPEN** | |
| 66 | +| `routed_prompt_intervention` | 0 | 5 | BLOCKED | |
| 67 | +| `controlled_prompt_morphology` | 0 | 5 | BLOCKED | |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Gate opened for superpowers_workflow_intervention on 2026-06-13 after 5 headless Claude Code sessions accumulated workflow intervention tags. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +## Deliverable 5: Phase 2 Auto-Detection — COMPLETE |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +With superpowers gate OPEN, Phase 2 enrichment recognition implemented: |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +- `_auto_detect_intervention_tags()` scans newly enriched session JSONL for causetrace_tags YAML blocks |
| 76 | +- Auto-sets `task_source`, `intervention_lane`, `causetrace_tags`, `intervention_evidence_level`, `intervention_evidence_source` in metadata sidecar |
| 77 | +- Wired into all three enrichment handlers (`enrich`, `enrich-opencode`, `enrich-codex`) |
| 78 | +- JSON-escaped newline handling fixed in `detect_causetrace_tags` |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Tag format detection verified against session 7e8574ec (actual YAML blocks in tool_input). Other 4 tagged sessions carry tags in metadata sidecars only (manually annotated during Phase 3E-3 headless runs). |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +## Deliverable 6: Tier 2 Readiness — DEFERRED (honest) |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +Tier 2 requires failure/near-failure density that the current corpus does not provide: |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +| Criterion | Current | Required | Status | |
| 87 | +|-----------|---------|----------|--------| |
| 88 | +| Native failure sessions (success=False) | 1 | 10 | NOT MET | |
| 89 | +| Native near-failure (human_intervention=True) | 5 | 10 | NOT MET | |
| 90 | +| Multi-runtime failure coverage | 6 | 3 | MET | |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +Failure and near-failure samples remain genuinely rare in real agent behavior. This mirrors the Phase 3D Tier 2 deferral finding. Background acquisition continues. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +## Deferred Hypotheses — Carried Forward |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +### Tier 2 (failure / intervention morphology) |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +- H-FM-001, H-FM-002, H-IM-001, H-IM-002, H-EV-004, H-EV-005 |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +Target: opportunistic validation when native failure >= 10, near-failure >= 10. |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +### Tier 3 (controlled benchmark / external lane) |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +- H-OT-001, H-OT-002, H-EG-001, H-EG-002, H-EV-002, H-EV-003 |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +Activate when controlled benchmark protocol is operational. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +### Tier 4 (literature-inspired, registry-only) |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +- H-EV-001, H-LH-001, H-LH-002 |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +Maintain in registry for future corpus expansion. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +## What Phase 3E Did NOT Do (per charter) |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +- Did not enter Phase 4 theory finalization |
| 117 | +- Did not merge intervention lanes into native baseline |
| 118 | +- Did not implement heuristic parser detection for blocked lanes |
| 119 | +- Did not implement prediction, anomaly detection, or auto-diagnosis |
| 120 | +- Did not promote hypotheses to conclusions without corpus-backed validation |
| 121 | +- Did not change topology taxonomy or readiness gates without justification |
| 122 | +- Did not make cross-lane comparisons beyond trend reporting |
| 123 | +- Did not make universal prompt policy recommendations |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +## Phase 3E Graduation Assessment |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +Phase 3E infrastructure work is complete. All designed sub-phases (3E-1 through 3E-3) delivered. Phase 2 auto-detection is operational for the one lane that met the gate threshold. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +Tier 2 validation is honestly deferred — the bottleneck is corpus failure density, not methodology or infrastructure. This is a data problem, not a design problem. |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +**Recommendation: Graduate Phase 3E. Mark complete. Carry deferred hypotheses and background acquisition forward.** |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +## Next Phase |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +Phase 4 (Theory Finalization) can be opened. Phase 4 scope is constrained by the Phase 3E operating rules that remain in effect: |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +- All claims must bind to a specific corpus snapshot and lane |
| 138 | +- Every percentage must include its denominator |
| 139 | +- Negative results are first-class entries |
| 140 | +- Do not promote hypotheses without corpus-backed validation |
| 141 | +- Intervention lane findings do not become universal policy without additional validation |
0 commit comments