-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
[MRG] Parallel writing of the object #1451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@sappelhoff, can you take a look when you have time, please? |
|
It is needed the other side, some test of writing, I think it will fail at the moment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1451 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.41% 96.91% -0.51%
==========================================
Files 41 43 +2
Lines 9371 9990 +619
==========================================
+ Hits 9129 9682 +553
- Misses 242 308 +66 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
sappelhoff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bruAristimunha the tests seem to pass now. Is this ready to be merged?
|
not yet, i am creating more tests |
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]>
|
hey @agramfort, Thank you for the revision 🙏🏽 |
sappelhoff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@larsoner do you have time to have a final look at this?
|
I increase the cache because it was collapsing, let me reverse |
|
@sappelhoff, I could only find the indication of this warning in the tests that didn't have the data, can you me for the test CI please? |
|
no idea what happened there before but it seems all fixed now. I think this can be merged once it got a final review by Eric. |
larsoner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few minor tweaks, otherwise LGTM
Co-authored-by: Eric Larson <[email protected]>
…mne-bids into parallel_writing
|
Many thanks @larsoner 🙏🏽 |
|
Thanks @bruAristimunha ! |
|
@bruAristimunha can you look into this failure: looks like |

PR Description
close #438.
I re-implemented the mne mechanism for the lock system. It was not possible to directly use the mne _open_lock, for two reasons:
Merge checklist
Maintainer, please confirm the following before merging.
If applicable: