We would like to refactor the ICA GUI to use the ICA API provided in MNE-Python. This will rely on the PR to solve the issues raised in: mne-tools/mne-python#9846 (comment)
I'll think about it, for now, I was more inclined towards (1) because it was constrained. Supporting only datasets in BIDS format makes this first version simpler.
I don't think it's a good idea to have a pop-up GUI to ask the user for a BIDS path, it can be more error-prone and I don't see a reason to save the IC labels in a .tsv sidecar in a BIDS folder if the original data and ICA decomposition are not in the same BIDS folder.
I like option (3) as well, modifying the ICA instance in place makes a lot of sense, and does not entirely make the .tsv redundant as it will also contain the information about who authored the labels (and other information).
We would like to refactor the ICA GUI to use the ICA API provided in MNE-Python. This will rely on the PR to solve the issues raised in: mne-tools/mne-python#9846 (comment)
Originally posted by @mscheltienne in #66 (comment)