Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hello @earizon Thanks for you comment. I can see the point, but do you have similar "standards" in mind ? Things that have many implementations in different languages ? The thing is that with Manifest, our main goal is to make people's life easier, we want to make deploying a backend smooth and accessible. The choice of using YAML goes it that direction, no need to be an expert in any language to leverage Manifest's power. What would be the purpose of making it a standard in your opinion ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This project rocks and is ideal in many scenarios.
As I see it, just formalizing it as an standard that different impletations can transform into running code, could represent a boost to the project.
Many teams can be reluctant to abandon Java or Go or C# or ... for many reasons (security, expertise, ...), but I guess they all would like to have the simplicity of manifest in their dev stack.
By just putting some effort to create a formal definition for the "manifest" standard, and leaving the current implementation as a default reference for the standard, many other "workgroups" could be attracted.
I'm talking (dreaming actually) of a Cloud Native Foundation alternative golang/rust implementation preinstalled in future Kubernetes, docker, AWS/GCP/Azure/...
From my point of view manifest suits perfectly the "desired future state" deployment of modern cloud stacks. A little standarization is all that needed.
My two cents!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions