Skip to content

Conversation

@DagBruck
Copy link
Contributor

@DagBruck DagBruck commented Jun 6, 2025

No description provided.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson self-requested a review June 12, 2025 14:32
Copy link
Contributor

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - could have been clearer that this needs the other PR.

@tobolar
Copy link
Collaborator

tobolar commented Jun 25, 2025

LGTM - could have been clearer that this needs the other PR.

Yes, PR of this branch on DagBruck:patch-2 would be a better option.
Nonetheless, waiting for merging of #268

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants