You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/4____network_abstraction.adoc
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ The network topology is shown on the left part and the corresponding data flow o
229
229
In this example FMU 1 and FMU 2 are communicating via a Bus Simulation.
230
230
Each of them have a <<low-cut-bus-terminal, Bus Terminal>> where the specified Bus Operations are exchanged.
231
231
Within the first communication point (first black dot), FMU 1 announces the time point when it wants to transmit data by setting the interval and the interval qualifier of the `countdown` `Tx_Clock`.
232
-
The importer will then call the `fmi3DoStep` functions of the FMUs with a corresponding communicationTimeStep to hit the requested time point (first red dot).
232
+
The importer will then call the `fmi3DoStep` functions of the FMUs with a corresponding communication step size to hit the requested time point (first red dot).
233
233
In the `Event Mode` the Bus Operation (the clocked binary variable) is then passed from FMU 1 to the Bus Simulation.
234
234
The Bus Simulation itself also uses a `countdown` `Tx_Clock` and announces a point in the future at which the Bus Operation should be transmitted to FMU 2.
235
235
The interval provided by the Bus Simulation might consider effects of the bus like the actual transmission time, but the interval could even be zero in case of an ideal bus abstraction.
0 commit comments