Releases: moov-io/iso8583
Release v0.10.0
Changelog
- added
message.Marshal(data)which sets values of message fields using values provided in thedatastruct. - added support of
indextag for bothmessage.Marshal()andmessage.Unmarshal(). Now you can name your fields as you want and useindextag to specify the field index matching the ISO8583 specification. Examples are here and here. - removed
iso8583.Unmarshal. Please, usemessage.Unmarshalinstead. - removed message.Data()
- deprecated
message.SetData(data). Usemessage.Marshal()instead. - deprecated
field.SetData(data). Usefield.Marshal(data)instead. - changed current behavior of
message.SetData(data). Before it could be used to get values into a struct after callingmessage.Unpack()like this:
data := &ISOMessage{}
mesage.SetData(data)
message.Unpack(rawMessage)
data.F1.Value // in previous versions, values were populated during unpacking, but now they are notNow message.SetData(data) only sets field values and you can't get values back to the struct using it. In order to get values into the struct you have to use message.Unmarshal(data) like this:
message.Unpack(rawMessage)
data := &ISOMessage{}
mesage.Unmarshall(data)
data.F1.Value // now you can get the valueMigration Guide
Two main changes that you may need to do in your code:
- Replace
message.SetData(data)withmessage.Marshal(data). Latter simply sets field values with values provided in thedatastruct. Without any side effects. - Replace
message.Data()(*YouMessageTypehere)withmessage.Unmarshal(data). It setsdatastruct values with message field values. No side-effects. - If you used
SetData()withUnpackto get access to message field values, then you have to replace it with justmessage.Unmarshal(data).
You have to change your code from this
type ISO87Data struct {
F0 *field.String
F2 *field.String
F4 *field.String
}
message := NewMessage(spec)
data := &ISO87Data{}
err := message.SetData(data) // you "link" data internally
err = message.Unpack(rawMsg) // here values are populated into linked data struct. it will not work anymore.
// access field values
data.F0.Value
data.F2.Value
data.F4.Valueto this:
type ISO87Data struct {
F0 *field.String
F2 *field.String
F4 *field.String
}
message := NewMessage(spec)
err := message.Unpack(rawMsg)
data := &ISO87Data{}
err = message.Unmarshal(data)
// access field values
data.F0.Value
data.F2.Value
data.F4.ValueIf you have any questions, please, submit an issue or ask in our community Slack channel.
Release v0.10.0-beta
Changes in this PR are not backward compatible! Few things have changed. Hopefully, migration will not be painful for you. If you have any questions, please, let us know here or in our community Slack channel.
Changes:
- added
message.Marshal(data)which sets values of message fields using values provided indatastruct. - added support of
indextag for bothmessage.Marshal()andmessage.Unmarshal(). Now you can name your fields as you want and usedindextag to specify field index in the ISO8583 specification. Examples are here and here. - removed
iso8583.Unmarshal. Please, usemessage.Unmarshalinstead. - removed message.Data()
- deprecated
message.SetData(data). Usemessage.Marshal()instead. - deprecated
field.SetData(data). Usefield.Marshal(data)instead. - changed current behavior of
message.SetData(data). Before it could be used to get values into a struct after callingmessage.Unpack()like this:
data := &ISOMessage{}
mesage.SetData(data)
message.Unpack(rawMessage)
data.F1.Value // if previous versions values were populated during unpacking, but now they are notNow message.SetData(data) only sets field values. No way to get values back to the struct. In order to get values into struct you have to use message.Unmarshal(data) like this:
message.Unpack(rawMessage)
data := &ISOMessage{}
mesage.Unmarshall(data)
data.F1.Value // now you can get the valueMigration Guide
Two main changes that you may need to do in your code:
- Replace
message.SetData(data)withmessage.Marshal(data). Latter, simply sets field values with values provided in thedatastruct. Without any side-effects. - Replce
message.Data()(*YouMessageTypehere) withmessage.Unmarshal(data). It setsdata` struct values with message field values. No side-effects. - If you used
SetData()and callUnpackto get access to message field values, replace it withmessage.Unmarshal(data).
You have to change your code from this
type ISO87Data struct {
F0 *field.String
F2 *field.String
F4 *field.String
}
message := NewMessage(spec)
data := &ISO87Data{}
err := message.SetData(data) // you "link" data internally
err = message.Unpack(rawMsg) // here values are populated into linked data struct. no more.
// now you access you
data.F0.Value
data.F2.Value
data.F4.Valueto this:
type ISO87Data struct {
F0 *field.String
F2 *field.String
F4 *field.String
}
message := NewMessage(spec)
err := message.Unpack(rawMsg)
data := &ISO87Data{}
err = message.Unmarshal(data)
// now you access fields in data
data.F0.Value
data.F2.Value
data.F4.ValueRelease v0.9.0
Changelog
- Fix panic on
message.Unpack(nil)or empty/smaller than expected input slice length (#161) - Implement
iso8583.Unmarshalmethod to populate data struct with message field values (#157) - Deprecated:
message.Data()will be removed in the next release. Please, useiso8583.Unmarshalinstead (see the example here).
Release v0.8.4
What's Changed
- added a missing
rightPadderto JSON spec builder by @adamdecaf in #156
Full Changelog: v0.8.2...v0.8.4
Release v0.8.3
Extend MTI enum (#153) * Add Reversal Request Response to MTI enum * Add 0180 and 0190 * Add administrative messages * specify that 0180 is positive * fix whitespace Co-authored-by: louis <[email protected]>
v0.8.2: Extend MTI enum (#153)
Changelog
- Extend MTI enum (#153) (add reversal response, administrative messages, network management, etc.)
Release v0.8.1
Release v0.7.0
Changelog
- Replace %v with %w in error messages (#152)
Release v0.6.8
Changelog
- Fix BCD decoding to limit number of bytes being read from source #137
Release v0.6.7
Changelog
- Use
=as default the separator in Track 2 #135