Skip to content

Missing discussion in README of why this instead of mosh #135

@dklempner

Description

@dklempner

The readme is missing any discussion of why someone would use this instead of mosh.

In general, mosh is a story for something very close to "ssh over quic" for most users -- with the major caveat that quic didn't exist when mosh was originally written, so mosh uses its own UDP protocol.

My impression is that this does have a few usecases, such as if there's a firewall that allows QUIC but not generic UDP, but it's probably worth calling those out.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions