Problem Statement
any-guardrail currently has no evaluation framework or metrics. This makes it impossible to:
- Measure guardrail performance scientifically
- Compare different guardrail models
- Validate improvements
- Benchmark against competitors
Current State
- No evaluation metrics (checked codebase)
- Only basic pass/fail in
GuardrailOutput.valid
- No benchmarking system
- No performance measurement
Proposed Solution
Add comprehensive evaluation framework with modern metrics:
from any_guardrail.evaluation import Evaluator
evaluator = Evaluator()
results = evaluator.evaluate(
guardrail,
test_data,
metrics=['accuracy', 'f1', 'latency']
)
print(results)
# {
# 'accuracy': 0.92,
# 'f1_score': 0.89,
# 'latency_ms': 45,
# 'confusion_matrix': [[...]]
# }
Features to Add
-
Basic Metrics:
- Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1
- Confusion matrices
- ROC curves
-
Advanced Metrics:
- Semantic similarity (BERTScore)
- Cross-lingual consistency
- Latency and throughput
-
Benchmarking:
- Standard test sets
- Comparison reports
- CI/CD integration
Implementation Plan
# src/any_guardrail/evaluation/
├── metrics.py # Core metrics
├── benchmarks.py # Standard datasets
├── reporter.py # Generate reports
└── __init__.py
Why This Matters
- Can't improve what you can't measure
- Users need to compare guardrail performance
- Required for research papers and publications
- Essential for production deployment decisions
References
Problem Statement
any-guardrail currently has no evaluation framework or metrics. This makes it impossible to:
Current State
GuardrailOutput.validProposed Solution
Add comprehensive evaluation framework with modern metrics:
Features to Add
Basic Metrics:
Advanced Metrics:
Benchmarking:
Implementation Plan
Why This Matters
References