Replies: 7 comments 7 replies
-
|
With this you could use the proxy containers extension to have the option to visit in tor or i2p or public |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Something that is also on the table is an option to not save history and an option to not save cookies (each option would not be linked, e.g. truth table would be 00 01 10 11) for a container |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Interesting! I can see how this can be useful for a heavy user of the multi-account-container feature. Maybe document this as a feature request? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not meaning to sound negative, as I think I'm very much for this idea ... but ... ... I think I already use MAC in this fashion with MAC + KeePassXC ... what am I missing that this provides already? ( given that it's not a good idea to keep passwords in any browser ... ) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
TLDR: underlying functionality already exists, but UI is sub optimal + idea for a better UI flow I switched to Firexfox just for this extension, expecting pretty much what op is after as well, being able to seamlessly switch between multiple accounts for a given site. Now functionally this is absolutely possible, but the UI for this use case is terrible. create container1 > open site in container1 > log into account1 > set to site to always open in container1 > create container2 > open site in container2 > log in to account2 > use 'repoen site in' to switch accounts > lots of site / account specific containers will now clutter the container menus. Instead create a new option 'log in with other account'. open site > log into account1 > press 'log in with other account' in extension menu > log in with account2 > switch accounts (under the hood containers) by
account names are extracted when user logs in and set as container name by default, but are editabel by the user, in case the log in is an email or phone number instead of the actual user name) As a bonus, at least for popular sites, profile pictures could be extracted with a formula, to be displayed next to the username for a quicker visual cue to the user. Really hope this gets traction, since the underlying functionality is there. It's just the UI that needs to be improved. *since simply logging into a site will not create an account specific container, clicking on the first account would open the general container that was used to first log into the site, but if for a given site there have been no log ins on any container yet, the option 'log in with other account' shows up as 'create container for login' (or something along those lines), while leaving the option functionally identical. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Aug 9th, was the last comment that I see here for this subject. It would be nice if the developers would correct this as people are screaming for this change. If the container names were kept in a nice tidy .json file instead of a .db file, this would not be an issue as a simple .py script would take care of this in an instant. Sometimes this works for login to cpanel or hosting/email servers etc;, that use a port number like domain.com:3821/ but it depends on how they handle their session cookies or session id's. In the mean time, there are 2 simple ways to accomplish this that will work.
The reason for doing step 1. with a url that doesn't resolve is that there are no cookies, trackers ect; to worry about or delete first. By doing it this way, you have a fresh page to log in. Wash rinse repeat for the other named containers for other user accounts. This is just two extra clicks, and you can open the same site in different containers. The other way still takes one extra click but is cleaner and my favorite, but it may not be available on all sites. Note: I am surprised that this one is not discussed more. This involves the easiest of them all.
Feel free to spread this around. No need to reference me, just trying to help. FYI. Fire Fox pw manager with Primary pw is you friend. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Background: I have multiple firefox portable instances installed on a USB for various tasks. The wrapper exe only checks that any firefox is running, not for a firefox already using the same profile. Because of this one cannot open more than one profile at the same time and also be able to open a url for an open profile from a cmd. (You can add tabs manually.) To get around this I don't use the wrapper exe. I open the firefox.exe in the portable folder directly and point it at the profile folder for that instance. This allows keypass to open several profiles at the same time and add also add tabs to these profiles. The is the keypass url override I use is below. cmd://"{REF:thisgetsthefirefoxexe}" -profile "{REF:thisgetstheprofilepath@...}" "{URL}" Now for Containers: The multi container works well for almost everything. The one place it does not work perfectly is with domains where I have more than one account. A profile per account would isolate the cookies, but that's too many profiles. A container does not have an easy way to associate a container to an account from just the domain url. For example, opening two tabs from a cmd for my goggle email end up in the same container. I can't use /u/0/and /u/1 url stuff because they don't associate with the account, just which happened to be opened first. Even if it did work, it would be a goggle only solution. So, my urls for my two accounts look the same and both use the same container and share cookies. I have to logout to use the other. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox (for workmail@gmail.com) -- not real addresses, btw My first thought was to add a query to the url that goggle would ignore. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?mymulticontainerkey=workmail/#inbox I would have a deterministic way to open the container with the cookies associated with the email account. However, multi container does not have an option to look for a custom query. (A tag might work but is more risky because it's not ignored and depends upon how parsing it was implemented.) I don't have any idea how you would know without metadata which "duplicate" container to use. The real url does not identify what I want. From keypass, all I can do is select profile and url. A few profiles is bad enough. One per account would be a night mare. So, the url is the only option? Maybe firefox needs a new parameter. firefox -profile blah -account blah url ? The container is specific to profile, account, and domain? Yuck. Glad I'm retired. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
How this would work.
What is the use case.
The main one I can think of is you have two accounts for one website loging out and loging in would suck and have to go to the extension is jank and out of the way so have a nice soft landing page for this perpus would make the usage experience for account hopping better then chrome.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions