Prepare v2026.4.13 release hardening (#23)

* Handle log source aliases and normalize error payloads

* feat(logs): wire runtime log config into diagnostics UI

* Fix confirmed audit findings

* Prepare v2026.4.13 release hardening

Author: mudrii

.claude/rules/go-idioms.md

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+globs:
+  - "**/*.go"
+---
+
+# Go 1.26 Idioms and Modernizers
+
+Write modern Go — never generate pre-1.24 patterns when the project's go.mod allows it.
+
+## Language (1.26)
+
+```go
+type yearsSince int
+age := new(yearsSince(born))     // *yearsSince — allocates and initializes from expression
+
+type Adder[A Adder[A]] interface { // self-referential generic constraints
+    Add(A) A
+}
+```
+
+`new(expr)` is available in Go 1.26. The return type is `*T` where `T` is the type of the expression. Use it when it improves clarity for optional scalar pointer values. Do not force it where `&T{...}` or a plain local variable is clearer.
+
+## Iterators (1.23+)
+
+Use `iter.Seq`/`iter.Seq2` and range-over-func. Prefer stdlib iterator APIs:
+- `slices.Collect`, `slices.Sorted`, `slices.SortedFunc`, `slices.Concat`
+- `maps.Keys`, `maps.Values`, `maps.Collect`, `maps.Insert`
+- `bytes.Lines`, `bytes.SplitSeq`, `strings.Lines`, `strings.SplitSeq`
+
+## Struct Tags (1.24+)
+
+- `omitzero` for struct-typed fields and types with `IsZero()` (e.g., `time.Time`)
+- `omitempty` for slices, maps, strings, and other empty-value cases
+- Use both when the wire format should omit either: `json:",omitzero,omitempty"`
+- JSON tag changes are behavior changes — review carefully
+- Generic type aliases are fully supported
+
+## go fix Modernizers (1.26)
+
+`go fix` applies modernizations in-place. Always review the git diff before committing — some rewrites change observable behavior.
+
+Useful analyzers:
+- `rangeint` — 3-clause `for` → `for range`
+- `minmax` — if/else clamp → `min`/`max`
+- `slicessort` — `sort.Slice` → `slices.Sort` for basic ordered types
+- `any` — `interface{}` → `any`
+- `fmtappendf` — `[]byte(fmt.Sprintf(...))` → `fmt.Appendf`
+- `testingcontext` — simple cancellable test context setup → `t.Context()`
+- `omitzero` — suggests `omitzero` for struct fields where `omitempty` has no effect
+- `mapsloop` — map update loops → `maps.Copy`/`maps.Insert`/`maps.Clone`/`maps.Collect`
+- `newexpr` — wrappers returning `&x` or call sites → `new(expr)`; result type is `*T` matching the expression's type
+- `stringsseq` / `stditerators` — loops over eager APIs → iterator-based forms
+- `waitgroup` — `wg.Add(1)`/`go`/`wg.Done()` → `wg.Go` (stdlib `sync.WaitGroup`); prefer `errgroup.Group.Go` from `golang.org/x/sync/errgroup` when error propagation is needed
+- `//go:fix inline` — source-level inliner for API migrations

.claude/rules/go-patterns.md

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+---
+globs:
+  - "**/*.go"
+---
+
+# Go Patterns and Style Reference
+
+Detailed conventions that complement `CLAUDE.md`. The go-rig skill owns process discipline (ATDD/TDD, DI, review workflow). This file owns language-specific patterns and API conventions.
+
+## Style
+
+- Package names: short, lowercase, no `util`/`common`/`helpers`
+- Initialisms: `ID`, `URL`, `HTTP`, `JSON`, `API`, `SQL`
+- No stutter: `orders.Service` not `orders.OrderService`
+- Accept interfaces, return structs
+- Constructors enforce invariants or own resources — not mandatory for every type
+- Options struct when params > 3
+- Prefer domain-specific named types and typed constants over `string`/`int` aliases
+- Avoid `map[string]any` / `any` in core domain code except at loose boundaries
+- Do not hardcode environment-specific values, collaborator selection, or operational limits
+
+## API Design
+
+- Make the zero value useful when practical
+- Prefer nil slices by default; do not distinguish nil from empty unless the API requires it
+- Pointer receivers when mutating or copying is non-trivial; keep receiver choice consistent
+- Avoid copying types with mutex-like fields
+- Keep exported APIs stable; treat JSON shape and error behavior changes as compatibility work
+- Explicit types for IDs, states, units — prevent invalid mixing at compile time
+
+## Documentation
+
+- Every exported name and package should have a doc comment
+- Doc comments start with the declared name and describe caller-visible behavior
+- Update docs when exported behavior, config, or wire format changes
+- Comments explain intent, invariants, ownership — not restate the code
+- TODOs must include a reason and ticket reference when one exists
+
+## Testing Patterns
+
+- Subtest names should be readable; failure messages make `got` vs `want` obvious
+- Prefer `for b.Loop() { ... }` for new benchmarks (1.24+)
+- `t.Context()` for test-lifetime context (no independent cancel needed)
+- `t.ArtifactDir()` for test output files (1.26)
+- `testing/synctest` for isolated concurrent code with virtual time (1.25+)
+- Prefer `cmp.Equal`/`cmp.Diff` for complex structure comparisons
+- Avoid brittle assertions on exact JSON formatting or error text unless that output is part of the contract
+- Acceptance tests verify user-visible behavior; unit tests keep domain rules fast and precise
+- Add fuzz tests for parsers and input-heavy packages when the project uses fuzzing
+
+## Common Patterns
+
+- **SQLite**: prefer `modernc.org/sqlite` (pure Go, no CGO). Parameterized queries only. Explicit transactions.
+- **CLI**: match existing framework (cobra, kong, or plain). Check `cmd/` and `internal/` layout before adding commands.
+- **HTTP / DB**: set client/server/query timeouts deliberately. Always close rows/bodies and check terminal errors (`rows.Err`, close failures).
+- **Modules**: avoid new dependencies without justification. Keep `replace` directives intentional and short-lived.
+- **Linting**: `.golangci.yml` v2 per project. Do not modify without request. Fix all lint findings.
+- **Static analysis**: prefer repo gates (`make lint`, `make ci`) and include `go vet ./...`, `staticcheck`, and other configured analyzers

.claude/skills/go-rig/SKILL.md

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ name: go-rig
 description: Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refactoring Go code that must follow strict design discipline — ATDD/TDD workflow, explicit dependency injection, package-boundary discipline, and structured code review. Complements CLAUDE.md by focusing on process and design judgment rather than version-specific Go features.
 metadata:
   short-description: Go design, workflow, and review discipline
+  slash-command: enabled
 ---
 
 # Go Rig
@@ -12,10 +13,12 @@ Strict design and testing discipline for Go projects.
 This skill **complements** `CLAUDE.md`.
 
 `CLAUDE.md` owns:
-- Go version and toolchain guidance
-- stdlib and language idioms
-- testing APIs and tooling commands
-- modernization guidance such as `go fix`
+- Go version, toolchain, and commands
+- Key style, error, context, and concurrency rules
+
+`.claude/rules/` owns:
+- Go 1.26 idioms and go fix modernizer catalog (`go-idioms.md`)
+- Detailed style, API, documentation, and testing patterns (`go-patterns.md`)
 
 This skill adds:
 - ATDD/TDD workflow
@@ -28,6 +31,16 @@ This skill adds:
 
 Do not restate or override version-specific guidance from `CLAUDE.md`. If `CLAUDE.md` is stricter on a shared point, follow `CLAUDE.md`.
 
+## When to Use
+
+Use this skill when:
+
+- implementing a new feature or behavior increment
+- refactoring Go code for clearer ownership or testability
+- reviewing package boundaries or dependency flow
+- replacing hidden collaborator construction with explicit injection
+- tightening tests around user-visible or integration behavior
+
 ## ATDD/TDD Workflow
 
 Test-first is a design tool, not an afterthought.
@@ -81,7 +94,6 @@ When applying SRP/DRY/OCP in Go, prefer deleting duplication caused by mixed res
 - If an abstraction adds files, wiring, and names but no clear testability or ownership win, do not add it
 
 Avoid:
-- interface-per-struct
 - repositories or services that only forward calls
 - configuration objects passed everywhere to avoid choosing explicit parameters
 - “future-proofing” abstractions without a concrete second implementation or consumer
@@ -90,9 +102,7 @@ Avoid:
 
 - A function should usually do one thing: validate, transform, orchestrate, persist, or render
 - If a function mixes business rules with transport, storage, or logging details, split it
-- Prefer early returns over nested condition pyramids
 - Keep parameter lists explicit and intention-revealing; if many values travel together for one reason, introduce a small typed struct
-- Use whitespace to separate logical phases so the control flow reads top to bottom
 
 Refactor when a function:
 - needs comments to explain the control flow
@@ -105,26 +115,8 @@ Refactor when a function:
 - **Constructors** for types that must enforce invariants or own long-lived collaborators
 - **Function parameters** for short-lived collaborators and pure logic
 - Never construct DB clients, HTTP clients, loggers, or repositories inside domain methods
-- No DI frameworks — explicit wiring only
-- No hidden globals or singletons
 - Prefer passing dependencies from the composition root (`main`, wiring package, or test setup) instead of looking them up deep inside the call stack
 - Inject seams for time, randomness, process execution, filesystem, and external I/O when behavior depends on them
-- Do not hide dependencies behind package-level variables except in rare compatibility shims
-
-```go
-// constructor injection for long-lived deps
-func NewOrderService(store OrderStore, clock Clock) *OrderService {
-    return &OrderService{store: store, clock: clock}
-}
-
-// function parameter for short-lived/pure logic
-func ValidateOrder(order Order, now time.Time) error {
-    if order.ExpiresAt.Before(now) {
-        return fmt.Errorf("order %s expired: %w", order.ID, ErrExpired)
-    }
-    return nil
-}
-```
 
 ## Package Design
 
@@ -136,11 +128,9 @@ Organize by domain, not by technical layer.
 - Split packages only when coupling pressure is real, not speculative
 
 Avoid:
-- interface-per-struct without a consumer need
 - deep layering in small services
-- `internal/platform/` catch-all layers — keep cross-cutting concerns in focused packages (`internal/config/`, `internal/db/`)
+- `internal/platform/` catch-all layers — keep cross-cutting concerns in focused packages
 - packages that combine unrelated domains because they share a datastore or transport
-- "shared" packages that centralize unrelated helpers and create import gravity
 
 ## Hardcoding And Configuration
 
@@ -204,32 +194,38 @@ Treat linting and static analysis as design feedback, not cosmetic cleanup.
 Before finishing any change, verify:
 
 - [ ] Package boundaries are coherent — no cross-domain leaks
-- [ ] No premature abstractions — interfaces have real consumers
 - [ ] Dependencies injected explicitly — no hidden construction
-- [ ] No hardcoded runtime values (URLs, ports, credentials, timeouts)
-- [ ] Types are explicit where they protect domain correctness
-- [ ] Functions are readable in one pass
-- [ ] Functions do not mix unrelated responsibilities
-- [ ] Repeated logic is unified only when it shares the same reason to change
-- [ ] Errors wrapped with useful context (`%w`)
+- [ ] Functions are readable in one pass and do not mix unrelated responsibilities
 - [ ] Tests cover acceptance behavior and unit behavior
 - [ ] TDD/ATDD flow was followed as closely as the repo constraints allowed
 - [ ] Behavioral compatibility checked where public APIs, JSON, or persistence shape changed
 - [ ] Nil vs empty behavior is intentional for slices, maps, pointers, and JSON fields
 - [ ] Concurrency changes have a shutdown path and observable ownership
-- [ ] Exported docs and package docs were updated when public behavior changed
-- [ ] Tests are robust against irrelevant formatting churn
-- [ ] Version/tooling guidance from `CLAUDE.md` has been followed
-- [ ] Lint and test gates expected by the repo have been run or consciously deferred
-
-## Reject These Patterns
-
-- Interface-per-struct without consumer need
-- Giant functions mixing validation, orchestration, and persistence
-- Hardcoded configuration or collaborator selection
-- Weakly typed domain data kept as raw maps or generic blobs without need
-- Comments that restate code
-- Brittle mock-only tests — prefer fakes with real behavior
-- Transport concerns embedded in core domain logic
-- Production design distorted to satisfy a mocking framework
-- Refactors that add indirection without improving correctness, ownership, or testability
+- [ ] Root-package wrappers added/updated for any new `internal/` exports
+- [ ] Lint and test gates (`make check`) have been run or consciously deferred
+
+## Project-Specific: Root-Package Facade
+
+This project uses a facade pattern where the root `dashboard` package re-exports `internal/` APIs via thin wrappers and type aliases.
+
+When adding a new feature:
+1. Implement logic in `internal/app<domain>/` with exported names
+2. Add type aliases (`type X = appfoo.X`) and wrapper functions in the root package
+3. Write tests at both the internal package level (unit) and root level (integration)
+
+When modifying an existing internal API:
+- If the signature changes, update the corresponding root-level wrapper
+- Root-level wrappers must remain zero-logic forwarding — no business logic in the facade
+
+Legacy note: `CollectTokenUsage` and `CollectTokenUsageWithCache` have 15+ map parameters. New code should use options structs per CLAUDE.md convention. These functions are candidates for future refactoring but are not blocking.
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+This skill is being followed correctly when:
+
+- changes are small, test-backed, and easy to review
+- dependency flow is explicit from the composition root
+- package responsibilities are cleaner after the change, not blurrier
+- the implementation follows the Go standards in `CLAUDE.md`
+- tests speak in behavior terms, not implementation vocabulary
+- the resulting code reads clearly without comments explaining the control flow

.codex/skills/frontend-dashboard/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+name: frontend-dashboard
+description: Use this skill when editing the embedded dashboard frontend in this repository. It focuses on preserving the single-file embedded SPA model, keeping the UI lightweight, and avoiding unnecessary frontend tooling or dependencies.
+---
+
+# Frontend Dashboard
+
+This is the native Codex frontend skill for the embedded dashboard UI in this repository.
+
+Use it when:
+- editing `web/index.html`
+- changing dashboard layout, styling, or interaction behavior
+- improving usability of the embedded SPA
+
+## Repository Constraints
+
+- The frontend is embedded into the Go binary.
+- Keep the frontend simple and self-contained.
+- Avoid introducing new frontend build systems, frameworks, or third-party packages unless explicitly requested.
+- Preserve compatibility with the Go server contract and embedded asset flow.
+
+## UI Direction
+
+- Prefer clear information hierarchy over visual noise.
+- Keep interactions fast and obvious.
+- Improve readability of metrics, status, and operational data first.
+- Use intentional spacing, typography, and contrast.
+- Favor small, maintainable JS and CSS over abstraction-heavy patterns.
+
+## Change Discipline
+
+- Do not turn the SPA into a toolchain-driven frontend without explicit approval.
+- Keep API assumptions explicit.
+- Treat data-shape changes between backend and frontend as contract changes.
+- When in doubt, optimize for operability and clarity instead of novelty.

.codex/skills/go-review/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+---
+name: go-review
+description: Use this skill when the task is to review Go code in this repository. Focus on bugs, regressions, API compatibility, test gaps, concurrency risks, and violations of the zero-dependency and root-facade constraints.
+---
+
+# Go Review
+
+This is the native Codex review skill for Go work in this repository.
+
+Use it when:
+- the user asks for a review
+- the task is to validate a Go change
+- the task is to assess risks before or after a refactor
+
+## Review Priorities
+
+Report findings first.
+Prioritize:
+- correctness bugs
+- behavioral regressions
+- API and JSON compatibility changes
+- missing or weak tests
+- concurrency and shutdown risks
+- dependency policy violations
+- facade leakage from root package into domain logic
+
+## Repository-Specific Checks
+
+- Root package wrappers must stay zero-logic.
+- New behavior belongs in `internal/app<domain>/`.
+- Do not assume third-party helpers are acceptable in this zero-dependency repo.
+- Treat `json:",omitempty"` and `json:",omitzero"` changes as API behavior changes.
+- Check that goroutines have shutdown and ownership semantics.
+
+## Review Output
+
+- Lead with concrete findings.
+- Use file references.
+- Keep summaries brief.
+- If there are no findings, say that explicitly and mention residual risk or testing gaps.