Fix example workflow permissions #42
Conversation
🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.✅ security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) ✅ license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details) |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @BakerNet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini or gemini-code-assist here, providing a summary of this pull request to help everyone get up to speed quickly.
This pull request, authored by BakerNet, aims to fix an issue with the permissions defined in an example GitHub Actions workflow documented in the README.md file. The title "Fix example workflow permissions" clearly indicates this intent. The change involves correcting a typo in the permission name required for interacting with pull requests.
Highlights
- Documentation Fix: The primary change is a correction within the project's
README.mdfile. - Workflow Permissions: Specifically, the change addresses the
permissionsblock for a GitHub Actions workflow example, correcting a key name.
Changelog
- README.md
- Corrected the permission key
pull-requestto the correctpull-requestswithin the example GitHub Actions workflow permissions block (lines 81-81).
- Corrected the permission key
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Codeowners approval required for this PR: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request provides a small but important correction to the example GitHub Actions workflow in the README.md. By changing pull-request: write to pull-requests: write, the example now accurately reflects the required permission key for interacting with pull requests. This enhances the clarity and correctness of the documentation, ensuring users who might copy this example will have a functional permission setting. Well done on catching this!
Summary of Findings
- Correctness of Example Workflow Permission: The PR fixes a typo in the example GitHub Actions workflow permissions within
README.md. The keypull-requestwas corrected topull-requests. This is the accurate key for granting permissions related to pull requests (e.g., requesting reviewers, adding comments), ensuring the example workflow functions as intended. The original typo would have resulted in the permission not being correctly applied.
Merge Readiness
This pull request addresses a clear typo in the documentation, improving its accuracy and the utility of the provided example. The change is correct and beneficial. The PR appears ready for merging. As an AI assistant, I cannot formally approve pull requests, so a final review and approval by designated maintainers is recommended before merging.
No description provided.