Skip to content

Conversation

@BakerNet
Copy link
Collaborator

@BakerNet BakerNet commented Jul 3, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @BakerNet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request performs post-release version updates. It updates the reference to a GitHub Action used in the repository's documentation and increments the internal version string of the associated CLI tool. This ensures that the project's dependencies and internal versioning are aligned with the latest release.

Highlights

  • GitHub Action Update: The multimediallc/codeowners-plus GitHub Action reference in README.md has been updated from v1.1.1 to v1.3.0.
  • CLI Version Bump: The internal version string for the codeowners-cli tool in tools/cli/main.go has been incremented from v1.1.2.dev to v1.3.1.dev.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pooyaw
Copy link

pooyaw commented Jul 3, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codeowners approval required for this PR:

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from zbedforrest July 3, 2025 18:49
@BakerNet BakerNet merged commit d1d11c7 into main Jul 3, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@BakerNet BakerNet deleted the post/v1.3.0 branch July 3, 2025 18:50
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR updates version numbers following the v1.3.0 release. The changes are straightforward. I've added two suggestions to improve security and maintainability based on common best practices.


- name: 'Codeowners Plus'
uses: multimediallc/codeowners-plus@v1.1.1
uses: multimediallc/codeowners-plus@v1.3.0

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using a version tag like @v1.3.0 is common, but for improved security and reproducible builds, it's a best practice to pin actions to a specific commit SHA. Tags are mutable and can be moved, which could lead to your workflow unexpectedly running different code. Using the full-length commit SHA of the v1.3.0 release would make this example more robust and secure against potential supply chain issues.

Name: "codeowners-cli",
Usage: "CLI tool for working with .codeowners files",
Version: "v1.1.2.dev",
Version: "v1.3.1.dev",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Hardcoding the version string here can be brittle and easy to forget to update. For better maintainability, consider setting the version at build time using linker flags (-ldflags). This would involve declaring a package-level version variable and then assigning it here (e.g., Version: version). This approach decouples the version string from the source code and makes it easier to automate version bumps during your release process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants