Skip to content

Conversation

@BakerNet
Copy link
Collaborator

Related Issue(s)

Summary / Background

Testing with base branch checked out

@pooyaw
Copy link

pooyaw commented Oct 30, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @BakerNet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on updating the .codeowners file. It replaces one designated code owner with another, ensuring that the correct individuals are requested for reviews on future changes. While the title and description mention testing with the base branch for ownership via actions/checkout, the core change is a direct modification to the code ownership assignments.

Highlights

  • Codeowners Update: The .codeowners file has been updated to reflect a change in code ownership, replacing @zbedforrest with @Eleeleth for all files.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/codeowners.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from zbedforrest October 30, 2025 22:27
@github-actions
Copy link

Codeowners approval required for this PR:

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the .codeowners file, replacing one user with another in the global ownership rule. The change is described as being for testing purposes, likely related to a CI workflow that validates code ownership. The modification is syntactically correct for a CODEOWNERS file. My review did not identify any technical issues or bugs in this change.

@BakerNet BakerNet closed this Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants