You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
> **⭐ Star Highlighting**: Stars indicate the best performing upload strategy (excluding Basic test) for each texture size. This focuses on upload performance when the GPU is under realistic load, as Basic tests use minimal shader complexity and don't represent real-world usage patterns.
143
148
149
+
## 🤖 Development Credits
150
+
151
+
This repository was built using **Windsurf with Claude Sonnet 3.5** - an AI-powered development environment that enabled rapid prototyping, comprehensive testing, and detailed performance analysis across WebGL and WebGPU APIs.
152
+
144
153
## 📝 License
145
154
146
155
MIT License - Feel free to use, modify, and distribute.
<p>A comprehensive benchmarking suite designed to measure and compare texture upload performance across WebGL and WebGPU APIs on various hardware platforms and browsers. Test different optimization strategies including allocation patterns, memory alignment, buffer management, and GPU synchronization approaches.</p>
183
188
</div>
184
189
190
+
<divclass="test-preview">
191
+
<imgsrc="test-image.png" alt="WebGL/WebGPU Texture Upload Test Screenshot" style="max-width: 100%; height: auto; border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 20px 0;">
📋 <strong>Usage:</strong> Run tests to compare upload strategies for your target hardware. Results help optimize texture streaming performance in web graphics applications.
212
221
</p>
213
-
<pstyle="color: #666; margin-bottom: 20px;">
222
+
<pstyle="color: #b0b0b0; margin-bottom: 20px;">
214
223
⭐ Focus on non-Basic tests for realistic GPU-loaded performance scenarios.
0 commit comments