Shielded Transfer Recipient should accept payment address

[Rigorously]

When initiating a Shielded Transfer Error: Unexpected Bech32m human-readable part znam, expected zsknam.

zsknam refers to a spending/shielding key and should be kept secret. Not even namadaw with --unsafe-show-secret shows it. The recipient address field should accept a znam payment address instead.

[euharrison]

It'll be done on #1191

[brentstone]

@euharrison Is this completely resolved following the merge of #1191?

[euharrison]

@brentstone I still need to test it to confirm

[Rigorously]

@brentstone I still need to test it to confirm

Housefire-below with Namadillo v1.0.6 should have all features enabled https://interface.knowable.run/

The Bech32m error is gone. The Shielded Transfer form allows to enter a payment address now,

The transaction itself throws an error. It skips the signature and gets stuck at "Transfer to Namada Shielded".

[mateuszjasiuk]

Yeah this won't work for now as we introduced a change to unshielding/shielded transfers flow. We need to unify logic between MASP and Transfer tabs. I will let you know

[mateuszjasiuk]

#1433

[euharrison]

Tested against campfire testnet

• Transfer shield -> shield is working fine ✅
• Transfer shield -> transparent is returning this error below

[brentstone]

@euharrison The tx is requiring more gas than the gas limit (which looks to be set by the interface prob?). Do we have functionality for a user to try higher gas? If not, this might be critically important now

[euharrison]

hmm weird, the json we are signing on keychain has the same gas as any other transfer. I'll explore this a little bit more, maybe this is something on the keychain or sdk side